Navalyze

Navalyze · Other · Ship

JI XIANG SONG

IMO
9608922
Type
Other ship types
Flag (estimated)
China
Port of registry
Xiamen
Technical efficiency
EEXI 8.28 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING (Xiamen) Co.,Ltd · part of COSCO Shipping

?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,512 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
86.8
Other median 90.4 kg/nm (−4%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
18.7
g CO₂/t·nm · Other median 72.9 (−74%)
Average speed
11.7 kn
Other median 10.1 kn (+16%)
Fuel per day at sea
24.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
402 t
CO₂ emitted
1,256 t
Distance sailed
4,637 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
396 h
17 days, 5% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,045 general cargo ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 93.6 kg/nm · median 59.9 (+56%)
36.2Ranks 973 of 1,045, lowest first89.2
Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 10.5 (+1%)
7.5Faster than 52% of general cargo ships12.5
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 10.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 20.7 (−48%)
8.03Ranks 215 of 1,045, lowest first40.8
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU59%
  • Into the EU30%
  • At berth in the EU10%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
128 t
10.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • JI XIANG SONG
  • Other median

Average speed, kn

  • JI XIANG SONG
  • Other median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • JI XIANG SONG
  • Other median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025–––––
2023→2024+0.8 kn−10%−3%−35%–0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−2.3 kn+24%+2%+380%+23%2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+1.0 kn+13%+22%−7%+12%1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021−1.1 kn−3%−11%+25%−3%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020–––––
2018→2019–––––

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025COSCO SHIPPING (Xiamen) Co.,Ltd00–0––––
2024COSCO SHIPPING (Xiamen) Co.,Ltd5181,6196,15454211.484.2––
2023not published8852,7669,45689510.693.625.9–
2022not published1484681,97115312.975.282.4–
2021not published1414512,11917711.966.3153–
2020not published1163711,69513113.068.5488–
2019not published00–0––––
2018not published4021,2564,63739611.786.818.7–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOther medianvs OtherRankVerifierMethods
2025COSCO SHIPPING (Xiamen) Co.,Ltd––––China Classification SocietyA
2024COSCO SHIPPING (Xiamen) Co.,Ltd––––China Classification SocietyA
2023not published10.720.7−48%215 of 1,045China Classification SocietyA
2022not published8.6821.6−60%92 of 1,034China Classification SocietyA
2021not published7.7822.7−66%48 of 1,142China Classification SocietyA
2020not published8.0124.5−67%44 of 1,167China Classification SocietyA
2019not published––––China Classification SocietyA
2018not published18.772.9−74%18 of 87China Classification SocietyA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.