Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- COSCO Shippingyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| COSCO Shipping | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 332 |
| CO₂ emitted | 4.4 Mt+8.2% |
| Fuel per mile | 224 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 13.5 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.3% |
| Ships burning LNG | 6 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- COSCO Shipping8.8 (−46% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSCO Shipping | 79 | 8.8 | −46% | 280 | 14.9 | 3,983 | 1.9% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- COSCO Shipping7.9 (+1% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSCO Shipping | 146 | 7.9 | +1% | 87 | 10.6 | 1,209 | 3.5% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5
- COSCO Shipping21.5 (−16% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSCO Shipping | 47 | 21.5 | −16% | 81 | 11.9 | 1,491 | 4.4% | – |
| Segment median | 25.5 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- COSCO Shipping6.9 (−13% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSCO Shipping | 29 | 6.9 | −13% | 101 | 10.4 | 2,771 | 8.9% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1
- COSCO Shipping6.4 (−11% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSCO Shipping | 5 | 6.4 | −11% | 192 | 16.0 | 1,749 | 2.2% | 5 |
| Segment median | 7.1 | 0% |
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4
- COSCO Shipping345 (+523% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSCO Shipping | 5 | 345 | +523% | 95 | 14.7 | 846 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Segment median | 55.4 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSCO Shipping | China Classification Society (297), ABS (33), Lloyd's Register (2) | 99% | 2% | 10% | 0% |
COSCO Shipping: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DA XIANG | 9768552 | General cargo | 361 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +1319% | 12.4 | 1,259 t | €33k |
| ZHONG YUAN HAI YUN KAI TUO | 9837640 | General cargo | 281 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +1005% | 13.3 | 1,843 t | €49k |
| DA KANG | 9608312 | General cargo | 141 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +454% | 10.2 | 507 t | €23k |
| RU YI SONG | 9608934 | General cargo | 121 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +375% | 10.8 | 250 t | €7k |
| WU ZHU HAI | 9494371 | Bulk carrier | 60.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +289% | 9.8 | 1,329 t | €36k |
| DA ZHI | 9608439 | General cargo | 89.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +252% | 11.3 | 727 t | €31k |
| JIU FENG LING | 9505443 | Bulk carrier | 54.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +249% | 9.6 | 379 t | €14k |
| DA QING | 9768540 | General cargo | 82.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +224% | 12.1 | 7,250 t | €210k |
| AN HAI WAN | 9563108 | Oil tanker | 76.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +181% | 9.9 | 6,095 t | €249k |
| TIAN SHOU | 9704752 | General cargo | 67.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +167% | 9.2 | 2,093 t | €63k |
| COSCO TENGFEI | 9454723 | Vehicle carrier | 420 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | +165% | 14.4 | 2,798 t | €87k |
| XING HAI WAN | 9570113 | Oil tanker | 70.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +161% | 10.5 | 7,724 t | €357k |
| PING HAI WAN | 9558579 | Oil tanker | 70.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +160% | 9.6 | 6,562 t | €262k |
| DA XIN | 9608427 | General cargo | 62.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +144% | 12.1 | 3,937 t | €128k |
| TAI HUA WAN | 9814387 | Oil tanker | 61.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +127% | 11.0 | 8,483 t | €287k |
| YUAN JIANG KOULNG | 9999591 | Vehicle carrier | 358 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | +126% | 16.4 | 2,430 t | €71k |
| DA JI | 9768538 | General cargo | 56.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +122% | 12.6 | 5,970 t | €173k |
| SHENG XING HAI | 9416537 | Bulk carrier | 33.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +117% | 8.2 | 703 t | €21k |
| COSCO SHENGSHI | 9454711 | Vehicle carrier | 332 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | +109% | 14.1 | 4,115 t | €132k |
| SHENG HUA WAN | 9814416 | Oil tanker | 54.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +102% | 11.8 | 8,711 t | €292k |
| ZHI YUAN KOU | 9639452 | Other | 152 g CO₂/t·nm | 91.1 | +67% | 9.6 | 12,120 t | €558k |
| DA GUI | 9768564 | General cargo | 42.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +66% | 11.0 | 5,519 t | €167k |
| DA DE | 9608403 | General cargo | 39.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +55% | 11.5 | 2,253 t | €77k |
| JIN XIA FENG | 9611711 | Bulk carrier | 7.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +49% | 11.0 | 2,427 t | €65k |
| SHENG CHENG HAI | 9505481 | Bulk carrier | 11.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | +47% | 9.6 | 1,558 t | €42k |
| QING PING SHAN | 9741504 | Bulk carrier | 11.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | +47% | 11.8 | 3,011 t | €84k |
| TIAN LE | 9722730 | General cargo | 34.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +36% | 12.1 | 10,124 t | €281k |
| OOCL SPAIN | 9908126 | Container | 9.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +36% | 15.7 | 53,804 t | €1.4m |
| FENG MAO HAI | 9747510 | Bulk carrier | 10.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | +34% | 11.2 | 1,821 t | €53k |
| YU LONG LING | 9505431 | Bulk carrier | 12.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | +33% | 8.3 | 4,228 t | €116k |
30 of 332 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.