Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

VIKTOR TSOI

IMO: 9609744
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 9,517 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.52 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB
Former names: NS YAKUTIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Takoor Ship Management LLC

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,517 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

104.6 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (+24%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

34.72

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (+329%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

823 t

CO₂ emitted

2,598 t

2,639 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

7,864 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

666 h

28 days, 8% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 104.6 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+24%)

61.8Ranks 2,539 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 11.8 kn · median 10.6 (+11%)

8.8Faster than 90% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.72 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+329%)

4.85Ranks 3,052 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU78%
Into the EU19%
At berth in the EU2%

44% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,142 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

VIKTOR TSOI
Bulk carrier median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

VIKTOR TSOI
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VIKTOR TSOI
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+2.9 kn	+8%	+43%	+59%	+338%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+28%	+25%	−76%	+26%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.8 kn	−32%	−48%	−40%	−15%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+0%	+2%	+2%	−38%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	−8%	−5%	+21%	+52%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+3%	−4%	−14%	−23%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Takoor Ship Management LLC	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024part-year	Klan Gemi Yonetimi Ltd Sti	140	449	1,407	129	10.9	99.5	–	–
2024	Takoor Ship Management LLC	823	2,598	7,864	666	11.8	104.6	34.72	–
2023	not published	480	1,514	4,934	555	8.9	97.2	7.92	58%
2022	not published	1,590	5,051	20,917	2,301	9.1	76.0	6.30	–
2021	not published	3,860	12,214	34,642	2,902	11.9	111.4	7.42	–
2020	not published	3,773	11,937	33,988	2,889	11.8	111.0	11.94	–
2019	not published	3,383	10,611	28,164	2,470	11.4	120.1	7.86	–
2018	not published	3,842	12,075	32,860	2,696	12.2	116.9	10.17	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Takoor Ship Management LLC	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	–
2024part-year	Klan Gemi Yonetimi Ltd Sti	–	–	–	–	ABS	–
2024	Takoor Ship Management LLC	34.72	8.09	+329%	3,052 of 3,089	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	7.92	8.27	−4%	1,611 of 3,548	ABS	–
2022	not published	6.30	8.71	−28%	833 of 3,968	ABS	C
2021	not published	7.42	8.57	−13%	1,182 of 3,466	Indian Register of Shipping	C
2020	not published	11.94	8.24	+45%	2,558 of 3,150	ABS	C
2019	not published	7.86	8.38	−6%	1,478 of 3,360	ABS	C
2018	not published	10.17	8.50	+20%	2,288 of 3,384	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.