EEMS DOVER
- IMO
- 9613630
- Type
- Other ship types (Offshore)
- Port of registry
- Delfzijl
- Technical efficiency
- EIV 19.00 g CO₂/t·nm
ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Scheepvaartonderneming Eems Dover B.V.
2025 at a glance
From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.
Within the offshore fleet, 2024
Set against all 5 offshore ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.
Where the emissions happen, 2025
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
- Between EU ports73%
- From the EU6%
- Into the EU8%
- At berth in the EU13%
4% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (111 t).
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The Offshore median is the middle ship of all offshore ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel per mile, kg/nm
- EEMS DOVER
- Offshore median
Average speed, kn
- EEMS DOVER
- Offshore median
CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm
- EEMS DOVER
- Offshore median
Year on year
| Year | Speed | Fuel per mile | Fuel per day | Distance | CO₂ per TW | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024→2025 | −0.7 kn | +22% | +4% | −1% | – | 0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2023→2024 | −4.6 kn | +11% | −41% | −61% | +30% | 4.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2022→2023 | +1.2 kn | +9% | +23% | +58% | −13% | 1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2021→2022 | −0.5 kn | −11% | −15% | −41% | +28% | 0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change. |
| 2020→2021 | +0.4 kn | −2% | +2% | +12% | −11% | 0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2019→2020 | +1.0 kn | −13% | −2% | +33% | −2% | 1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2018→2019 | +3.2 kn | +24% | +110% | +202% | +19% | 3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | At sea h | Speed kn | Fuel kg/nm | CO₂ g/t·nm | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Scheepvaartonderneming Eems Dover B.V. | 843 | 2,704 | 17,079 | 3,791 | 4.5 | 49.4 | – | – |
| 2024 | Scheepvaartonderneming Eems Dover B.V. | 700 | 2,244 | 17,313 | 3,318 | 5.2 | 40.4 | 51.81 | – |
| 2023 | not published | 1,627 | 5,216 | 44,739 | 4,552 | 9.8 | 36.4 | – | – |
| 2022 | not published | 948 | 3,038 | 28,259 | 3,268 | 8.6 | 33.5 | – | – |
| 2021 | not published | 1,809 | 5,800 | 47,856 | 5,276 | 9.1 | 37.8 | – | – |
| 2020 | not published | 1,651 | 5,293 | 42,918 | 4,934 | 8.7 | 38.5 | – | – |
| 2019 | not published | 1,429 | 4,581 | 32,329 | 4,182 | 7.7 | 44.2 | – | – |
| 2018 | not published | 381 | 1,221 | 10,697 | 2,351 | 4.5 | 35.6 | 34.78 | – |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm | Offshore median | vs Offshore | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Scheepvaartonderneming Eems Dover B.V. | – | – | – | – | RINA | A |
| 2024 | Scheepvaartonderneming Eems Dover B.V. | 51.81 | 48.81 | +6% | 4 of 5 | RINA | A |
| 2023 | not published | 39.73 | 20.67 | +92% | 931 of 1,045 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2022 | not published | 45.74 | 21.57 | +112% | 942 of 1,034 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2021 | not published | 35.76 | 22.70 | +58% | 966 of 1,142 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2020 | not published | 40.31 | 24.50 | +65% | 979 of 1,167 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2019 | not published | 41.27 | 24.96 | +65% | 942 of 1,154 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2018 | not published | 34.78 | 24.89 | +40% | 761 of 1,044 | Bureau Veritas | A |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Offshore ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's offshore ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.