Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Segment

Offshore ships, 2025

614 offshore ships reported to THETIS-MRV for 2025, emitting 3.3 Mt of CO₂. Efficiency is measured as g CO₂/t·nm.

Offshore ships often have no cargo metric and enter the EU ETS only in 2027.

The segment at a glance

Median ship
1,367
g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel per mile
83 kg
Median ship
Average speed
4.6 kn
Median ship, distance over hours at sea
Hours at sea
2,343
Median ship, EU-scope voyages (27% of the year)
CO₂ at berth
10.7%
Share emitted alongside in EU ports
Ships burning LNG
2
of 91 benchmarked

Operators

Who runs offshore ships in EU trades, and how their fleets compare. Technical shows efficiency, speed and time at sea; commercial shows the allowance bill.

#Group
1SAIPEM (Portugal) - Comercio Maritimo, Sociedade Unipessoal LDA.6–––––9.3%–
2Dredging Environmental and marine engineering NV26–––––7.0%–
3Dredging & Maritime Management16–––––10.6%–
4PGS Geophysical AS6–––––2.3%–
5Tidewater3 companies29–––––4.0%–
6Solstad Shipping AS15–––––9.1%–
7Allseas4 companies, 1 in offshore7–––––30.4%–
8ESVAGT A/S43+47%2,006763.27,1575.4%–
9Heerema Marine Contractors Nederland SE4–––––17.4%–
10Rohde Nielsen A/S15–––––4.2%–
11Eidesvik AS12–––––5.9%–
12Subsea 7 Int'l Contracting Ltd16–––––14.7%–
13Island Offshore Management AS11–––––12.2%–
14Aurora Offshore Management AS18+15%1,5671373.82,0044.1%2
15Havila3 companies, 2 in offshore12−31%942664.05,9206.0%–
16Boskalis Offshore Long Distance Towage B.V.7–––––4.0%–
17Seaway 7 Offshore Contractors B.V.3–––––33.6%–
18Fugro Marine Service B.V.18–––––16.3%–
19Olympic Shipping AS11–––––13.0%–
20REM MARITIME AS10+1703%24,651684.26,0745.3%–
21PHOENIX OFFSHORE SRL11–––––7.2%–
22DEME Offshore NL BV3–––––6.4%–
23Sea World Management SAM5−78%3012393.72,82417.3%–
24Technip UK Limited5–––––17.0%–
25JD Crafts A/S7–––––0.0%–

Operators with at least 3 ships in this segment. Figures cover their ships in this segment only, so a group active in several segments (MSC runs container and cruise ships) has its full total on the market page. Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership; tell us at info@navalyze.com if one is in the wrong group. Click a column to rank by it.

Efficiency by ship size

Bigger ships move a tonne of cargo for less fuel, so ships are compared within size bands. Each row is drawn against the segment median.

0.25×0.5×segment median2×4×
  • Q1: ~3 t38,000 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q2: ~87 t3,550 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q3: ~238 t1,040 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q4: ~658 t467 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q5: ~4,157 t77.3 g CO₂/t·nm

Q1 to Q5 split the fleet into fifths by average cargo carried, derived from the published ratios.

Who verifies the reports

Accredited verifiers check each ship's MRV report. Their share of the segment's ships and CO₂.

Share of CO₂Share of ships

How fuel is measured

Each ship's monitoring plan names one or more of the four MRV methods.

A · Bunker delivery notes
41%
Fuel bought, corrected by tank soundings
B · Bunker tank monitoring
63%
Tank readings on board
C · Flow meters
36%
Meters on the fuel lines to engines and boilers
D · Direct measurement
0%
CO₂ measured in the exhaust

Most common combinations

  • B36%
  • A26%
  • B + C18%
  • A + B + C7%
  • C5%
  • A + C5%
  • A + B2%

Share of 611 emission reports that name a method; a report can name several.

Notes

  • Medians and rankings use 91 full-year reports with fuel; part-year and zero-fuel reports count towards totals only.
  • THETIS reports time at sea on EU-scope voyages only, not time in port. CO₂ at berth is the closest measure of port activity it publishes.
  • Speed and distance are derived from the published ratios; THETIS has no distance column.