Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

TAO LIN WAN

IMO: 9614062
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 81,613 t
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Shang Hai
Technical efficiency: EIV 2.25 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 81,951 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

167

Oil tanker median 138 kg/nm (+21%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.37

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.83 (−28%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Oil tanker median 9.7 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,122 t

CO₂ emitted

6,626 t

Distance sailed

12,693 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,192 h

50 days, 14% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,961 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 178 kg/nm · median 131 (+36%)

79.6Ranks 1,665 of 1,961, lowest first192

Average speedThis ship 9.8 kn · median 10.9 (−10%)

7.9Faster than 28% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.79 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.51 (−20%)

4.85Ranks 637 of 1,961, lowest first25.0

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU11%
Into the EU83%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

378 t

5.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TAO LIN WAN
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’192019’222022

Average speed, kn

TAO LIN WAN
Oil tanker median

9.510.010.511.0

’192019’222022

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TAO LIN WAN
Oil tanker median

6.07.08.09.0

’192019’222022

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2019→2022	−0.9 kn	+6%	−2%	−54%	+7%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2022	not published	1,028	3,202	5,778	590	9.8	178	6.79	–
2019	not published	2,122	6,626	12,693	1,192	10.7	167	6.37	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2022	not published	6.79	8.51	−20%	637 of 1,961	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	6.37	8.83	−28%	501 of 1,919	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.