Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

MARYAM

IMO: 9615676
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 42,202 t
Port of registry: Liberia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.15 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SFL KATE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SFL KATE INC · part of SFL

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 42,202 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

96.8 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+17%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.21

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (−9%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,796 t

CO₂ emitted

5,648 t

5,736 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

18,560 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,832 h

76 days, 21% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 96.8 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+17%)

61.0Ranks 2,772 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 10.7 (−6%)

8.8Faster than 31% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.21 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (−9%)

4.80Ranks 1,491 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU23%
Into the EU66%
At berth in the EU4%

3% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (145 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MARYAM
Bulk carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MARYAM
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MARYAM
Bulk carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−1%	−2%	+22%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+0%	+5%	−12%	−4%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−1%	−5%	+51%	−54%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	+0.7 kn	−21%	−15%	+8%	+24%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	+15%	+2%	+6%	+30%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.7 kn	−3%	+15%	+71%	+24%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	SFL KATE INC	1,711	5,381	17,874	1,719	10.4	95.7	6.87	–
2025	Anglo-Eastern (UK) Limited	1,796	5,648	18,560	1,832	10.1	96.8	7.21	–
2024	SFL KATE INC	1,485	4,630	15,183	1,489	10.2	97.8	7.40	–
2023	not published	1,680	5,248	17,243	1,767	9.8	97.5	7.70	–
2022	not published	1,124	3,535	11,437	1,120	10.2	98.3	16.89	–
2020	not published	1,327	4,186	10,631	1,125	9.5	124.9	13.64	–
2019	not published	1,085	3,378	10,026	939	10.7	108.2	10.49	–
2018	not published	651	2,031	5,857	652	9.0	111.2	8.43	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	SFL KATE INC	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2025	Anglo-Eastern (UK) Limited	7.21	7.89	−9%	1,491 of 3,610	ABS	B+C
2024	SFL KATE INC	7.40	8.09	−9%	1,254 of 3,089	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	7.70	8.27	−7%	1,529 of 3,548	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	16.89	8.71	+94%	3,563 of 3,968	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.64	8.24	+66%	2,759 of 3,150	DNV	C
2019	not published	10.49	8.38	+25%	2,372 of 3,360	DNV	C
2018	not published	8.43	8.50	−1%	1,662 of 3,384	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.