Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ANATOLIY SIDENKO

IMO
9618721
Type
General cargo ship
Average cargo carried
1,981 t
Flag (estimated)
Russia
Port of registry
Novorossiysk
Technical efficiency
EIV 13.92 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IC
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
31.5
General cargo median 57.7 kg/nm (−45%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
49.3
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.0 (+97%)
Average speed
3.4 kn
General cargo median 9.7 kn (−65%)
Fuel per day at sea
2.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
36 t
CO₂ emitted
113 t
Distance sailed
1,142 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
337 h
14 days, 4% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2021

Set against all 1,142 general cargo ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 32.3 kg/nm · median 55.9 (−42%)
34.9Ranks 66 of 1,142, lowest first96.3
Average speedThis ship 6.0 kn · median 10.9 (−45%)
8.2Faster than 2% of general cargo ships13.1
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 27.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 22.7 (+23%)
10.7Ranks 806 of 1,142, lowest first41.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU65%
  • Into the EU32%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
3 t
2.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • ANATOLIY SIDENKO
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • ANATOLIY SIDENKO
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • ANATOLIY SIDENKO
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2020→2021+0.8 kn+11%+28%−65%−6%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+1.8 kn−8%+38%+489%−40%1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2021not published772432,3873996.032.351.3–
2020not published1956116,7301,2865.229.0––
2019not published361131,1423373.431.5––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2021not published27.922.7+23%806 of 1,142VerifaviaA
2020not published29.824.5+22%798 of 1,167VerifaviaA
2019not published49.325.0+97%1,009 of 1,154VerifaviaA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.