Navalyze

Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

HAPPY PELICAN

IMO
9618850
Type
Gas carrier
Average cargo carried
1,049 t
Flag (estimated)
Isle of Man
Port of registry
Douglas
Technical efficiency
EEXI 15.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Navigator Gas Ship Management (Denmark) ApS

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,603 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
72.1
Gas carrier (LPG) median 84.4 kg/nm (−15%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
143
g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 46.9 (+205%)
Average speed
5.7 kn
Gas carrier (LPG) median 13.1 kn (−56%)
Fuel per day at sea
9.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,884 t
CO₂ emitted
9,155 t
Distance sailed
39,983 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
7,072 h
295 days, 81% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 90.5 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+11%)
49.8Ranks 227 of 355, lowest first124
Average speedThis ship 15.2 kn · median 12.6 (+21%)
8.8Faster than 97% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 264 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (+642%)
14.4Ranks 347 of 355, lowest first120
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports45%
  • From the EU25%
  • Into the EU21%
  • At berth in the EU9%
Fuel burned laden
2,884 t
100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
809 t
8.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • HAPPY PELICAN
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Average speed, kn

  • HAPPY PELICAN
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • HAPPY PELICAN
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+5.9 kn+32%+117%−41%+43%5.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024+2.1 kn−2%+25%−14%+49%2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+0.8 kn−7%+6%+27%−18%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+0.7 kn+5%+17%−20%+7%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+0.6 kn−13%−4%+9%−17%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−0.2 kn+28%+23%+13%+51%Same speed, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.1 kn+0%+2%−8%−23%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Bio blendNavigator Gas Ship Management (Denmark) ApS1,8575,67720,5211,34915.290.5264–
2024Navigator Gas Ship Management (Denmark) ApS2,3747,52834,6863,7499.368.5185–
2023not published2,8439,04340,4975,6157.270.2125–
2022not published2,4077,67131,8545,0136.475.6152–
2021not published2,8849,15539,9837,0725.772.1143100%
2020not published3,0569,77336,7487,1755.183.2171–
2019not published2,1126,73932,4406,1355.365.1114–
2018not published2,2747,26835,0896,7135.264.8147–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmGas carrier (LPG) medianvs Gas carrier (LPG)RankVerifierMethods
2025Bio blendNavigator Gas Ship Management (Denmark) ApS26435.6+642%347 of 355VerifaviaB+C
2024Navigator Gas Ship Management (Denmark) ApS18535.8+417%299 of 306VerifaviaB+C
2023not published12541.8+198%293 of 330VerifaviaB+C
2022not published15242.5+258%335 of 348VerifaviaC
2021not published14346.9+205%302 of 323VerifaviaC
2020not published17142.3+305%328 of 339VerifaviaC
2019not published11445.9+148%286 of 331VerifaviaC
2018not published14753.1+176%271 of 297VerifaviaC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.