Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ALTAMIRA

IMO: 9619426
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 58,145 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EIV 12.43 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ASM Maritime BV

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 63,683 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

278

Container median 172 kg/nm (+61%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−23%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

105.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,272 t

CO₂ emitted

47,563 t

Distance sailed

54,998 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,491 h

145 days, 40% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 278 kg/nm · median 177 (+57%)

78.8Ranks 1,850 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 13.3 (+12%)

9.1Faster than 75% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−8%)

7.22Ranks 1,002 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports23%
From the EU33%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,136 t

4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ALTAMIRA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ALTAMIRA
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ALTAMIRA
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.5 kn	+6%	+18%	−0%	+26%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+5%	+9%	−78%	+12%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−3.1 kn	−21%	−37%	+8%	−26%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	+9%	+13%	−18%	+1%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+6%	+4%	+7%	+4%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	−14%	−20%	+77%	−19%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−4%	−9%	−66%	+4%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ASM Maritime BV	3,234	10,105	11,633	782	14.9	278	14.9	–
2024	ASM Maritime BV	3,056	9,522	11,660	870	13.4	262	11.9	–
2023	not published	13,102	40,830	52,249	4,062	12.9	251	10.6	–
2022	not published	15,399	47,969	48,266	3,015	16.0	319	14.3	–
2021	not published	17,291	53,855	58,890	3,815	15.4	294	14.1	–
2020	not published	15,272	47,563	54,998	3,491	15.8	278	13.6	–
2019	not published	10,031	31,238	31,014	1,828	17.0	323	16.8	–
2018	not published	30,235	94,357	90,032	4,998	18.0	336	16.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ASM Maritime BV	14.9	16.3	−8%	1,002 of 2,208	Verifavia	B
2024	ASM Maritime BV	11.9	17.5	−32%	594 of 1,974	Verifavia	B
2023	not published	10.6	19.4	−45%	431 of 1,899	Verifavia	B
2022	not published	14.3	19.1	−26%	644 of 1,825	Verifavia	B
2021	not published	14.1	17.9	−21%	641 of 1,781	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	13.6	17.6	−23%	631 of 1,797	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	16.8	18.9	−11%	771 of 1,788	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	16.1	20.2	−20%	610 of 1,705	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.