Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ALBANY

IMO: 9619438
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 70,845 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EIV 10.93 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ASM Maritime BV

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 96,855 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

360

Container median 186 kg/nm (+94%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−35%)

Average speed

16.5 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

142.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,811 t

CO₂ emitted

64,843 t

Distance sailed

57,864 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,507 h

146 days, 40% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 260 kg/nm · median 177 (+47%)

78.8Ranks 1,740 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.3 kn · median 13.3 (+8%)

9.1Faster than 65% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−30%)

7.22Ranks 735 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports26%
From the EU36%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,059 t

6.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ALBANY
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ALBANY
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ALBANY
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.2 kn	−28%	−22%	+8%	−15%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+45%	+45%	−24%	+25%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 45%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−2.9 kn	−20%	−35%	−3%	−16%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−13%	−16%	−5%	+11%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+21%	+24%	+75%	−12%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.5 kn	+1%	+40%	+816%	+8%	4.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−5.1 kn	+7%	−26%	−79%	−15%	5.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ASM Maritime BV	11,386	35,494	43,719	3,061	14.3	260	11.5	–
2024	ASM Maritime BV	14,756	45,978	40,602	3,107	13.1	363	13.5	–
2023	not published	13,336	41,539	53,159	4,081	13.0	251	10.8	–
2022	not published	17,182	53,534	54,805	3,437	15.9	314	12.8	–
2021	not published	20,811	64,843	57,864	3,507	16.5	360	11.6	–
2020	not published	9,809	30,560	33,120	2,048	16.2	296	13.2	–
2019	not published	1,061	3,310	3,616	309	11.7	293	12.2	–
2018	not published	4,829	15,040	17,531	1,046	16.8	275	14.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ASM Maritime BV	11.5	16.3	−30%	735 of 2,208	Verifavia	B
2024	ASM Maritime BV	13.5	17.5	−23%	713 of 1,974	Verifavia	B
2023	not published	10.8	19.4	−45%	441 of 1,899	Verifavia	B
2022	not published	12.8	19.1	−33%	537 of 1,825	Verifavia	B
2021	not published	11.6	17.9	−35%	442 of 1,781	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	13.2	17.6	−25%	588 of 1,797	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	12.2	18.9	−35%	461 of 1,788	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	14.4	20.2	−29%	515 of 1,705	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.