Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ANCHORAGE

IMO: 9619440
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 60,570 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.93 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ASM Maritime BV

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 58,293 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

264

Container median 178 kg/nm (+49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−26%)

Average speed

15.2 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

96.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,228 t

CO₂ emitted

44,317 t

Distance sailed

53,804 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,530 h

147 days, 40% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 274 kg/nm · median 177 (+55%)

78.8Ranks 1,826 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.2 kn · median 13.3 (+14%)

9.1Faster than 79% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−14%)

7.22Ranks 938 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU41%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,573 t

3.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ANCHORAGE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ANCHORAGE
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ANCHORAGE
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	+1%	+4%	+26%	+2%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	+12%	+27%	−32%	−6%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	−9%	−22%	+2%	+4%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	−11%	−18%	−14%	+1%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+13%	+18%	+34%	−5%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−15%	−15%	+405%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ASM Maritime BV	12,921	40,250	47,163	3,111	15.2	274	14.1	–
2024	ASM Maritime BV	10,135	31,570	37,297	2,538	14.7	272	13.9	–
2023	not published	13,219	41,194	54,668	4,193	13.0	242	14.7	–
2022	not published	14,228	44,317	53,804	3,530	15.2	264	14.1	–
2021	not published	18,690	58,221	62,567	3,782	16.5	299	14.0	–
2020	not published	12,375	38,540	46,811	2,951	15.9	264	14.7	–
2019	not published	2,881	8,975	9,273	582	15.9	311	15.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ASM Maritime BV	14.1	16.3	−14%	938 of 2,208	Verifavia	B
2024	ASM Maritime BV	13.9	17.5	−21%	750 of 1,974	Verifavia	B
2023	not published	14.7	19.4	−24%	722 of 1,899	Verifavia	B
2022	not published	14.1	19.1	−26%	637 of 1,825	Verifavia	B
2021	not published	14.0	17.9	−22%	625 of 1,781	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	14.7	17.6	−16%	722 of 1,797	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	15.8	18.9	−16%	710 of 1,788	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.