Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

PRINCESS SHAIMAA

IMO: 9620138
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 27,423 t
Port of registry: Valetta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.45 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: IVS RAFFLES

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Logan Ship Management Co

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,423 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

62.5 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−24%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.14

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (−10%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,690 t

CO₂ emitted

5,298 t

5,381 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

27,057 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,562 h

107 days, 29% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 62.5 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−24%)

61.0Ranks 440 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 10.7 (−1%)

8.8Faster than 46% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.14 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (−10%)

4.80Ranks 1,444 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU60%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU3%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,874 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

PRINCESS SHAIMAA
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PRINCESS SHAIMAA
Bulk carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PRINCESS SHAIMAA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−4%	−3%	+156%	−30%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.6 kn	−16%	−38%	+209%	−37%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.1 kn	−8%	+18%	−55%	+14%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+9%	+7%	−1%	−47%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−7%	−0%	−77%	+138%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.6 kn	−9%	+60%	+269%	+1%	4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Logan Ship Management Co	1,690	5,298	27,057	2,562	10.6	62.5	7.14	–
2024	Logan Ship Management Co	685	2,148	10,579	1,009	10.5	64.8	10.17	–
2023	not published	265	838	3,429	244	14.1	77.2	16.21	–
2022	not published	639	2,002	7,625	691	11.0	83.8	14.25	–
2021	not published	592	1,855	7,690	682	11.3	77.0	26.83	–
2020	not published	2,794	8,761	33,875	3,207	10.6	82.5	11.27	–
2019	not published	832	2,597	9,184	1,522	6.0	90.6	11.11	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Logan Ship Management Co	7.14	7.89	−10%	1,444 of 3,610	ClassNK	A
2024	Logan Ship Management Co	10.17	8.09	+26%	2,178 of 3,089	EMICERT	A
2023	not published	16.21	8.27	+96%	3,147 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	14.25	8.71	+64%	3,341 of 3,968	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	26.83	8.57	+213%	3,400 of 3,466	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	11.27	8.24	+37%	2,448 of 3,150	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	11.11	8.38	+33%	2,517 of 3,360	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.