Navalyze · Con-ro · Ship

BAHRI HOFUF

IMO: 9620956
Type: Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Saudi Arabia
Port of registry: Dammam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.67 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bahri Ship Management DMCC

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

87.3

Con-ro median 126 kg/nm (−31%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

8.74

g CO₂/m³·nm · Con-ro median 8.10 (+8%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Con-ro median 15.2 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,526 t

CO₂ emitted

4,769 t

Distance sailed

17,486 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,337 h

56 days, 15% of the year

Within the con-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 58 con-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 107 kg/nm · median 135 (−21%)

95.0Ranks 9 of 58, lowest first162

Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 13.9 (+4%)

12.9Faster than 69% of con-ro ships15.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 17.2 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.92 (+73%)

4.60Ranks 49 of 58, lowest first40.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Con-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU23%
Into the EU69%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

1,491 t

98% of all fuel; 2% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

114 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Con-ro median is the middle ship of all con-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BAHRI HOFUF
Con-ro median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BAHRI HOFUF
Con-ro median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

BAHRI HOFUF
Con-ro median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	+10%	+16%	+24%	+95%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+6%	+10%	+20%	−72%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	+12%	+18%	+50%	+257%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−7%	−10%	−34%	+1%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.9 kn	+18%	+38%	−4%	−52%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+1%	−3%	+65%	−83%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−27%	−28%	−70%	+241%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	2,769	8,742	25,913	1,788	14.5	107	–	96%
2024	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	2,017	6,325	20,870	1,502	13.9	96.7	–	96%
2023	not published	1,585	4,977	17,458	1,301	13.4	90.8	–	94%
2022	not published	943	2,978	11,600	917	12.6	81.3	–	96%
2021	not published	1,526	4,769	17,486	1,337	13.1	87.3	–	98%
2020	not published	1,349	4,212	18,191	1,629	11.2	74.2	–	–
2019	not published	808	2,519	11,008	941	11.7	73.4	–	–
2018	not published	3,630	11,409	36,333	3,060	11.9	99.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	Con-ro median	vs Con-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	17.2	9.92	+73%	49 of 58	ABS	A+C
2024	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	8.82	9.36	−6%	29 of 64	ABS	A+C
2023	not published	31.6	8.42	+275%	55 of 56	ABS	C
2022	not published	8.85	7.68	+15%	39 of 59	ABS	C
2021	not published	8.74	8.10	+8%	38 of 62	ABS	C
2020	not published	18.2	8.53	+113%	54 of 69	ABS	C
2019	not published	110	9.58	+1,049%	65 of 67	Lloyd's Register	C
2018	not published	32.3	11.6	+179%	61 of 65	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Con-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's con-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.