Navalyze · Con-ro · Ship

BAHRI TABUK

IMO: 9620968
Type: Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Saudi Arabia
Port of registry: Dammam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.63 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bahri Ship Management DMCC

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

91.6

Con-ro median 127 kg/nm (−28%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

32.7

g CO₂/m³·nm · Con-ro median 9.58 (+242%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

Con-ro median 15.6 kn (−12%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,553 t

CO₂ emitted

7,982 t

Distance sailed

27,874 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,013 h

84 days, 23% of the year

Within the con-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 58 con-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 91.3 kg/nm · median 135 (−33%)

95.0Ranks 6 of 58, lowest first162

Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 13.9 (+4%)

12.9Faster than 72% of con-ro ships15.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.88 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.92 (−0%)

4.60Ranks 29 of 58, lowest first40.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Con-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU58%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

200 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Con-ro median is the middle ship of all con-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BAHRI TABUK
Con-ro median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BAHRI TABUK
Con-ro median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

BAHRI TABUK
Con-ro median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.4 kn	+10%	+23%	−34%	+45%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.8 kn	−25%	−34%	+143%	−19%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+1.9 kn	+22%	+40%	−52%	−74%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	−1%	−14%	+105%	+225%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.0 kn	+10%	+27%	−67%	−19%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	−9%	−14%	−20%	−62%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	−8%	+0%	−24%	+168%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	1,068	3,366	11,689	804	14.5	91.3	–	96%
2024	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	1,462	4,578	17,683	1,354	13.1	82.7	–	95%
2023	not published	803	2,513	7,273	488	14.9	110	–	93%
2022	not published	1,363	4,266	15,075	1,158	13.0	90.4	–	97%
2021	not published	673	2,104	7,346	491	15.0	91.7	–	96%
2020	not published	1,851	5,779	22,305	1,711	13.0	83.0	–	–
2019	not published	2,553	7,982	27,874	2,013	13.8	91.6	–	–
2018	not published	3,634	11,367	36,555	2,882	12.7	99.4	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	Con-ro median	vs Con-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	9.88	9.92	−0%	29 of 58	ABS	A+C
2024	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	6.82	9.36	−27%	14 of 64	ABS	A+C
2023	not published	8.46	8.42	+0%	29 of 56	ABS	C
2022	not published	33.1	7.68	+331%	57 of 59	ABS	C
2021	not published	10.2	8.10	+26%	48 of 62	ABS	C
2020	not published	12.6	8.53	+47%	52 of 69	ABS	C
2019	not published	32.7	9.58	+242%	55 of 67	Lloyd's Register	C
2018	not published	12.2	11.6	+5%	39 of 65	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Con-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's con-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.