Navalyze · Con-ro · Ship

BAHRI JAZAN

IMO: 9620970
Type: Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Saudi Arabia
Port of registry: Dammam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.00 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bahri Ship Management DMCC

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

95.5

Con-ro median 135 kg/nm (−29%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

41.7

g CO₂/m³·nm · Con-ro median 11.6 (+260%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Con-ro median 16.0 kn (−28%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,962 t

CO₂ emitted

9,289 t

Distance sailed

31,007 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,683 h

112 days, 31% of the year

Within the con-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 58 con-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 90.9 kg/nm · median 135 (−33%)

95.0Ranks 5 of 58, lowest first162

Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 13.9 (+4%)

12.9Faster than 71% of con-ro ships15.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.64 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.92 (−3%)

4.60Ranks 27 of 58, lowest first40.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Con-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports43%
From the EU16%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

471 t

5.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Con-ro median is the middle ship of all con-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BAHRI JAZAN
Con-ro median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BAHRI JAZAN
Con-ro median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

BAHRI JAZAN
Con-ro median

0.010.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	+5%	+12%	−15%	+30%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	−12%	−18%	+170%	−67%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	+3%	+9%	−58%	+153%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	+10%	+11%	+41%	−37%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.5 kn	+14%	+39%	−18%	+42%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+3%	+7%	−61%	−68%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	−23%	−28%	+26%	−26%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	1,542	4,856	16,970	1,170	14.5	90.9	–	96%
2024	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	1,713	5,360	19,873	1,450	13.7	86.2	–	97%
2023	not published	723	2,260	7,356	501	14.7	98.3	–	98%
2022	not published	1,652	5,213	17,342	1,255	13.8	95.2	–	98%
2021	not published	1,061	3,318	12,269	896	13.7	86.5	–	97%
2020	not published	1,140	3,575	15,052	1,344	11.2	75.8	–	–
2019	not published	2,879	8,985	39,043	3,643	10.7	73.7	–	–
2018	not published	2,962	9,289	31,007	2,683	11.6	95.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	Con-ro median	vs Con-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	9.64	9.92	−3%	27 of 58	ABS	A+C
2024	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	7.40	9.36	−21%	18 of 64	ABS	A+C
2023	not published	22.2	8.42	+163%	53 of 56	ABS	C
2022	not published	8.77	7.68	+14%	36 of 59	ABS	C
2021	not published	14.0	8.10	+73%	50 of 62	ABS	C
2020	not published	9.85	8.53	+15%	44 of 69	ABS	C
2019	not published	30.7	9.58	+221%	54 of 67	Lloyd's Register	C
2018	not published	41.7	11.6	+260%	62 of 65	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Con-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's con-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.