Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ERHAN

IMO: 9625449
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 27,850 t
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.49 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Ciner Ship Management Ltd

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,850 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

61.3 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (−28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.87

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (−15%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

473 t

CO₂ emitted

1,476 t

1,499 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

7,712 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

745 h

31 days, 9% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 61.3 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−28%)

61.8Ranks 290 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 10.6 (−2%)

8.8Faster than 40% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.87 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (−15%)

4.85Ranks 1,026 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU20%
Into the EU57%
At berth in the EU5%

61% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (903 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ERHAN
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

ERHAN
Bulk carrier median

9.510.010.511.011.5

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ERHAN
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−25%	−25%	−30%	−31%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−15%	−11%	−16%	−18%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+24%	+25%	−19%	+36%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	−1.2 kn	+19%	+5%	−7%	+33%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.6 kn	−16%	−12%	−17%	−31%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Ciner Ship Management Ltd	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2025part-year	Ciner Ship Management	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	Ciner Ship Management	473	1,476	7,712	745	10.4	61.3	6.87	–
2023	not published	898	2,839	10,967	1,064	10.3	81.9	10.02	–
2022	not published	1,253	3,964	13,010	1,321	9.8	96.3	12.22	–
2021	not published	1,248	3,897	16,098	1,644	9.8	77.5	9.00	–
2019	not published	1,136	3,558	17,377	1,574	11.0	65.4	6.76	–
2018	not published	1,641	5,154	20,975	2,011	10.4	78.3	9.79	80%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Ciner Ship Management Ltd	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A
2025part-year	Ciner Ship Management	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	Ciner Ship Management	6.87	8.09	−15%	1,026 of 3,089	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	10.02	8.27	+21%	2,367 of 3,548	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	12.22	8.71	+40%	3,043 of 3,968	Lloyd's Register	A
2021	not published	9.00	8.57	+5%	1,906 of 3,466	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	6.76	8.38	−19%	998 of 3,360	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	9.79	8.50	+15%	2,149 of 3,384	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.