Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

ENERGOS CELSIUS

IMO: 9626027
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.82 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: GOLAR CELSIUS

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

268

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+6%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

9.50

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (−8%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

82.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

21,700 t

CO₂ emitted

61,377 t

Distance sailed

80,883 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,295 h

262 days, 72% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 284 kg/nm · median 231 (+23%)

167Ranks 238 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 14.2 (+0%)

10.7Faster than 49% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 15.4 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+70%)

5.47Ranks 310 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU44%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,099 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ENERGOS CELSIUS
LNG carrier median

200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

ENERGOS CELSIUS
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

ENERGOS CELSIUS
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	+6%	+17%	−81%	+62%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.9 kn	+3%	−21%	+671%	+4%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.6 kn	−0%	−9%	−5%	−0%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020	+6.7 kn	−44%	−11%	−64%	−30%	6.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 44%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023	not published	4,341	13,056	15,288	1,077	14.2	284	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	21,700	61,377	80,883	6,295	12.8	268	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	2,747	7,569	10,497	628	16.7	262	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	2,879	7,934	11,000	601	18.3	262	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	14,046	39,488	30,188	2,612	11.6	465	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	15.4	9.10	+70%	310 of 355	DNV	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	9.50	10.4	−8%	169 of 379	DNV	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	9.11	10.5	−13%	122 of 289	DNV	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	9.15	10.7	−15%	88 of 267	DNV	C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	13.1	10.9	+20%	142 of 197	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.