Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GASLOG SYDNEY

IMO: 9626273
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.81 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

275

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

14.9

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (+37%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (−16%)

Fuel per day at sea

74.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,431 t

CO₂ emitted

57,700 t

Distance sailed

74,179 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,557 h

273 days, 75% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 236 kg/nm · median 231 (+2%)

167Ranks 189 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 16.5 kn · median 14.2 (+16%)

10.7Faster than 96% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.77 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+7%)

5.47Ranks 196 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU32%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

8,438 t

41% of all fuel; 59% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,747 t

4.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GASLOG SYDNEY
LNG carrier median

220.0240.0260.0280.0300.0320.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

GASLOG SYDNEY
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

GASLOG SYDNEY
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−4%	−1%	−10%	−16%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	−0.2 kn	−5%	−6%	−34%	+31%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+4.8 kn	−6%	+34%	−24%	−40%	4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7,915	21,845	33,537	2,035	16.5	236	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	9,206	25,654	37,467	2,350	15.9	246	–	56%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	14,706	40,588	56,746	3,522	16.1	259	–	59%
2019LNG / alt.	not published	20,431	57,700	74,179	6,557	11.3	275	–	41%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG / alt.	not published	9.77	9.10	+7%	196 of 355	ABS	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	11.7	10.4	+13%	230 of 379	ABS	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	8.90	10.7	−17%	73 of 267	ABS	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	14.9	10.9	+37%	194 of 248	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.