Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GASLOG SYDNEY

IMO
9626273
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Bermuda
Port of registry
Hamilton
Technical efficiency
EEXI 6.81 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
259
LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (−13%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
8.90
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (−17%)
Average speed
16.1 kn
LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (+10%)
Fuel per day at sea
100.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
14,706 t
CO₂ emitted
40,588 t
Distance sailed
56,746 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,522 h
147 days, 40% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 236 kg/nm · median 231 (+2%)
167Ranks 189 of 355, lowest first359
Average speedThis ship 16.5 kn · median 14.2 (+16%)
10.7Faster than 96% of LNG carrier ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.77 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+7%)
5.47Ranks 196 of 355, lowest first17.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU58%
  • Into the EU40%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
8,735 t
59% of all fuel; 41% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
865 t
2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • GASLOG SYDNEY
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • GASLOG SYDNEY
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • GASLOG SYDNEY
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2022→2023+0.6 kn−4%−1%−10%−16%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022−0.2 kn−5%−6%−34%+31%Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020+4.8 kn−6%+34%−24%−40%4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2023LNG / alt.not published7,91521,84533,5372,03516.5236––
2022LNG / alt.not published9,20625,65437,4672,35015.9246–56%
2020LNG / alt.not published14,70640,58856,7463,52216.1259–59%
2019LNG / alt.not published20,43157,70074,1796,55711.3275–41%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2023LNG / alt.not published9.779.10+7%196 of 355ABSB+C
2022LNG / alt.not published11.710.4+13%230 of 379ABSB+C
2020LNG / alt.not published8.9010.7−17%73 of 267ABSB+C
2019LNG / alt.not published14.910.9+37%194 of 248ABSB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.