Navalyze · Con-ro · Ship

BAHRI JEDDAH

IMO: 9626522
Type: Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Saudi Arabia
Port of registry: Dammam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.63 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bahri Ship Management DMCC

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

88.8

Con-ro median 127 kg/nm (−30%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

8.36

g CO₂/m³·nm · Con-ro median 8.53 (−2%)

Average speed

14.2 kn

Con-ro median 15.7 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,585 t

CO₂ emitted

4,950 t

Distance sailed

17,852 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,256 h

52 days, 14% of the year

Within the con-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 58 con-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 102 kg/nm · median 135 (−25%)

95.0Ranks 8 of 58, lowest first162

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 13.9 (+5%)

12.9Faster than 74% of con-ro ships15.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 11.4 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.92 (+15%)

4.60Ranks 36 of 58, lowest first40.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Con-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU28%
Into the EU70%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

87 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Con-ro median is the middle ship of all con-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BAHRI JEDDAH
Con-ro median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BAHRI JEDDAH
Con-ro median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

BAHRI JEDDAH
Con-ro median

0.010.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+7%	+5%	+67%	+61%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.6 kn	−12%	−3%	−74%	−51%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	+8%	−1%	+250%	+62%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.8 kn	+3%	+17%	−31%	−1%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	+9%	−2%	−5%	+6%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	+28%	+52%	+171%	−81%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−28%	−32%	−75%	+41%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	1,806	5,686	17,795	1,219	14.6	102	–	97%
2024	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	1,009	3,152	10,628	716	14.9	94.9	–	98%
2023	not published	4,449	13,925	41,122	3,081	13.3	108	–	97%
2022	not published	1,173	3,682	11,733	804	14.6	100	–	98%
2021	not published	1,638	5,114	16,927	1,319	12.8	96.8	–	96%
2020	not published	1,585	4,950	17,852	1,256	14.2	88.8	–	–
2019	not published	455	1,420	6,582	545	12.1	69.2	–	–
2018	not published	2,537	7,935	26,394	2,072	12.7	96.1	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	Con-ro median	vs Con-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	11.4	9.92	+15%	36 of 58	ABS	A+C
2024	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	7.06	9.36	−25%	15 of 64	ABS	A+C
2023	not published	14.3	8.42	+69%	51 of 56	ABS	C
2022	not published	8.79	7.68	+14%	37 of 59	ABS	C
2021	not published	8.88	8.10	+10%	40 of 62	ABS	C
2020	not published	8.36	8.53	−2%	34 of 69	ABS	C
2019	not published	44.5	9.58	+364%	57 of 67	Lloyd's Register	C
2018	not published	31.5	11.6	+172%	60 of 65	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Con-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's con-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.