Navalyze · Container · Ship

EVER LUCID

IMO: 9629055
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 52,712 t
Flag (estimated): Taiwan
Port of registry: Keelung
Technical efficiency: EIV 19.32 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 52,712 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

324

Container median 165 kg/nm (+96%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−1%)

Average speed

19.0 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+44%)

Fuel per day at sea

148.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

869 t

CO₂ emitted

2,726 t

Distance sailed

2,681 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

141 h

6 days, 2% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 324 kg/nm · median 165 (+96%)

77.6Ranks 1,817 of 1,899, lowest first291

Average speedThis ship 19.0 kn · median 13.2 (+44%)

10.0Faster than 100% of container ships15.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.4 (−1%)

7.34Ranks 942 of 1,899, lowest first51.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU35%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

242 t

8.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EVER LUCID
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’212021’232023

Average speed, kn

EVER LUCID
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’212021’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EVER LUCID
Container median

17.018.019.020.0

’212021’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2021→2023	+2.3 kn	+43%	+63%	−50%	+13%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 43%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023	not published	869	2,726	2,681	141	19.0	324	19.3	–
2021	not published	1,224	3,859	5,391	322	16.7	227	17.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	19.3	19.4	−1%	942 of 1,899	ClassNK	A+C
2021	not published	17.1	17.9	−5%	846 of 1,781	ABS	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.