Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MARAN GAS APOLLONIA

IMO: 9633422
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Greece
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.65 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

215

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (−15%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

7.94

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (−24%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

73.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,699 t

CO₂ emitted

41,900 t

Distance sailed

68,234 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,822 h

201 days, 55% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 214 kg/nm · median 231 (−7%)

167Ranks 151 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 13.4 kn · median 14.2 (−6%)

10.7Faster than 33% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 7.89 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (−13%)

5.47Ranks 146 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU43%
Into the EU56%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

578 t

1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MARAN GAS APOLLONIA
LNG carrier median

200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

MARAN GAS APOLLONIA
LNG carrier median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

MARAN GAS APOLLONIA
LNG carrier median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−1%	−6%	−2%	−1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.4 kn	+5%	+27%	+926%	–	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−2%	−7%	−86%	–	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−7%	−7%	+115%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.9 kn	−7%	−19%	+74%	−28%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023LNG / alt.	not published	14,273	39,975	66,752	4,982	13.4	214	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	14,699	41,900	68,234	4,822	14.1	215	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	1,366	3,772	6,651	567	11.7	205	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	10,209	28,166	48,553	3,953	12.3	210	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	5,104	14,217	22,617	1,832	12.3	226	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	3,159	8,867	12,978	915	14.2	243	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7.89	9.10	−13%	146 of 355	ABS	A+B
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7.94	10.4	−24%	131 of 379	ABS	A
2021LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	A
2020LNG / alt.	not published	7.57	10.7	−29%	46 of 267	ABS	A
2019LNG / alt.	not published	8.14	10.9	−25%	52 of 248	ABS	A
2018LNG / alt.	not published	11.4	10.9	+4%	113 of 197	ABS	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.