Navalyze · Container · Ship

CAP SAN MALEAS

IMO: 9633941
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 77,141 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.65 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED · part of Synergy Marine

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 77,141 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

231.2 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+31%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.37

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−43%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

72.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,002 t

CO₂ emitted

9,383 t

9,530 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

12,981 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

988 h

41 days, 11% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 231.2 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+31%)

78.8Ranks 1,501 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 13.3 (−2%)

9.1Faster than 47% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.37 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−43%)

7.22Ranks 501 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU39%
Into the EU57%
At berth in the EU0%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CAP SAN MALEAS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CAP SAN MALEAS
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CAP SAN MALEAS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	−10%	−21%	−75%	–	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.3 kn	+23%	+44%	+259%	–	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.1 kn	−15%	−27%	−58%	+17%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	−4%	−15%	−34%	+7%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−6%	−5%	−16%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+1%	−2%	−11%	−4%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	−4%	−8%	−9%	−1%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED	3,002	9,383	12,981	988	13.1	231.2	9.37	–
2025	SYNERGY PACIFIC PRIVATE LIMITED	3,002	9,383	12,981	988	13.1	231.2	9.37	–
2024	SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED	13,038	40,727	51,019	3,406	15.0	255.6	–	–
2023	not published	2,966	9,353	14,220	1,118	12.7	208.6	12.35	–
2022	not published	8,417	26,305	34,154	2,307	14.8	246.4	10.58	–
2021	not published	13,244	41,380	51,379	3,094	16.6	257.8	9.89	–
2020	not published	16,852	52,639	61,474	3,754	16.4	274.1	10.12	–
2019	not published	18,876	59,084	69,332	4,111	16.9	272.2	10.53	–
2018	not published	21,634	67,688	75,903	4,356	17.4	285.0	10.66	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A+C
2025	SYNERGY PACIFIC PRIVATE LIMITED	9.37	16.30	−43%	501 of 2,208	ClassNK	A+C
2024	SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	12.35	19.40	−36%	558 of 1,899	ClassNK	A+B
2022	not published	10.58	19.13	−45%	360 of 1,825	ClassNK	A+B
2021	not published	9.89	17.90	−45%	313 of 1,781	ClassNK	A+B
2020	not published	10.12	17.58	−42%	385 of 1,797	ClassNK	A+B
2019	not published	10.53	18.88	−44%	361 of 1,788	ClassNK	A+B
2018	not published	10.66	20.22	−47%	302 of 1,705	ClassNK	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.