Navalyze · Container · Ship

CAP SAN MALEAS

IMO: 9633941
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 77,141 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.65 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED · part of Synergy Marine

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 80,930 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

272

Container median 174 kg/nm (+56%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−44%)

Average speed

16.9 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

110.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,876 t

CO₂ emitted

59,084 t

Distance sailed

69,332 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,111 h

171 days, 47% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 231 kg/nm · median 177 (+31%)

78.8Ranks 1,501 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 13.3 (−2%)

9.1Faster than 47% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.37 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−43%)

7.22Ranks 501 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports27%
From the EU26%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,136 t

7.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CAP SAN MALEAS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CAP SAN MALEAS
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CAP SAN MALEAS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	−10%	−21%	−75%	–	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.3 kn	+23%	+44%	+259%	–	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.1 kn	−15%	−27%	−58%	+17%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	−4%	−15%	−34%	+7%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−6%	−5%	−16%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+1%	−2%	−11%	−4%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	−4%	−8%	−9%	−1%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED	3,002	9,383	12,981	988	13.1	231	9.37	–
2025	SYNERGY PACIFIC PRIVATE LIMITED	3,002	9,383	12,981	988	13.1	231	9.37	–
2024	SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED	13,038	40,727	51,019	3,406	15.0	256	–	–
2023	not published	2,966	9,353	14,220	1,118	12.7	209	12.4	–
2022	not published	8,417	26,305	34,154	2,307	14.8	246	10.6	–
2021	not published	13,244	41,380	51,379	3,094	16.6	258	9.89	–
2020	not published	16,852	52,639	61,474	3,754	16.4	274	10.1	–
2019	not published	18,876	59,084	69,332	4,111	16.9	272	10.5	–
2018	not published	21,634	67,688	75,903	4,356	17.4	285	10.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A+C
2025	SYNERGY PACIFIC PRIVATE LIMITED	9.37	16.3	−43%	501 of 2,208	ClassNK	A+C
2024	SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	12.4	19.4	−36%	558 of 1,899	ClassNK	A+B
2022	not published	10.6	19.1	−45%	360 of 1,825	ClassNK	A+B
2021	not published	9.89	17.9	−45%	313 of 1,781	ClassNK	A+B
2020	not published	10.1	17.6	−42%	385 of 1,797	ClassNK	A+B
2019	not published	10.5	18.9	−44%	361 of 1,788	ClassNK	A+B
2018	not published	10.7	20.2	−47%	302 of 1,705	ClassNK	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.