Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

SOLARIS

IMO: 9634098
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.83 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

263

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.2

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+5%)

Average speed

14.2 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

89.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,354 t

CO₂ emitted

17,526 t

Distance sailed

24,174 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,707 h

71 days, 19% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 233 kg/nm · median 231 (+1%)

167Ranks 182 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 14.2 (+4%)

10.7Faster than 65% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 7.58 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (−17%)

5.47Ranks 135 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU52%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

2,986 t

47% of all fuel; 53% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

270 t

1.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SOLARIS
LNG carrier median

200.0225.0250.0275.0300.0325.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

SOLARIS
LNG carrier median

12.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

SOLARIS
LNG carrier median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−8%	−16%	+26%	−24%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+17%	+10%	+135%	+35%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.1 kn	−18%	+1%	−65%	−35%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.8 kn	−0%	+14%	+1%	+36%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023LNG / alt.	not published	5,787	16,073	24,842	1,676	14.8	233	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	5,012	14,077	19,721	1,216	16.2	254	–	56%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	1,816	5,008	8,376	486	17.3	217	–	53%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	6,354	17,526	24,174	1,707	14.2	263	–	47%
2019LNG / alt.	not published	6,306	17,578	23,973	1,926	12.4	263	–	65%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7.58	9.10	−17%	135 of 355	ABS	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	9.97	10.4	−4%	180 of 379	ABS	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	7.36	10.5	−30%	72 of 289	Lloyd's Register	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	11.2	10.7	+5%	152 of 267	Lloyd's Register	B
2019LNG / alt.	not published	8.27	10.9	−24%	55 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.