Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM VOLTAIRE

IMO: 9635652
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 46,306 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia (from the 2021 report)
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: RHODOS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 45,155 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

225

Container median 178 kg/nm (+27%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−18%)

Average speed

15.5 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

83.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,671 t

CO₂ emitted

49,403 t

Distance sailed

69,776 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,503 h

188 days, 51% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 220 kg/nm · median 177 (+24%)

78.8Ranks 1,406 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 89% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−9%)

7.22Ranks 1,000 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports42%
From the EU6%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

14,214 t

91% of all fuel; 9% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,655 t

3.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM VOLTAIRE
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM VOLTAIRE
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM VOLTAIRE
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	+3%	+8%	−2%	+5%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.5 kn	+2%	−7%	+7%	−7%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.2 kn	−6%	+1%	−12%	−3%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.8 kn	−5%	−20%	+2%	+7%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.1 kn	+11%	+19%	+100%	+6%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2020	+6.0 kn	−11%	+38%	+461%	−31%	6.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	14,217	44,523	64,574	4,042	16.0	220	14.9	96%
2024part-year	CMA CGM SA	1,140	3,548	4,156	220	18.9	274	16.1	97%
2024	CMA CGM SA	14,054	43,822	65,699	4,310	15.2	214	14.2	96%
2023	not published	12,889	40,194	61,363	3,684	16.7	210	15.3	83%
2022	not published	15,671	49,403	69,776	4,503	15.5	225	15.7	91%
2021	not published	16,272	51,306	68,680	3,748	18.3	237	14.6	–
2020	not published	7,328	23,105	34,346	2,002	17.2	213	13.8	–
2018	not published	1,460	4,567	6,117	548	11.2	239	20.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	14.9	16.3	−9%	1,000 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024part-year	CMA CGM SA	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM SA	14.2	17.5	−19%	774 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	15.3	19.4	−21%	744 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	15.7	19.1	−18%	748 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	14.6	17.9	−18%	686 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	13.8	17.6	−22%	647 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	20.1	20.2	−1%	842 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.