Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

MAERSK ADRIATIC

IMO: 9636632
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 14,375 t
Port of registry: Svendborg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.68 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SYNERGY DENMARK A/S · part of Synergy Marine

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,375 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

91.3 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (−29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.11

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+153%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,930 t

CO₂ emitted

9,277 t

9,421 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

32,091 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,660 h

111 days, 30% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 91.3 kg/nm · median 128.5 (−29%)

76.1Ranks 325 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 10.7 (+13%)

8.0Faster than 89% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.11 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+153%)

4.51Ranks 1,395 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports59%
From the EU18%
Into the EU7%
At berth in the EU17%

86% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,017 t).

Fuel burned laden

40%

60% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

16.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MAERSK ADRIATIC
Oil tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAERSK ADRIATIC
Oil tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAERSK ADRIATIC
Oil tanker median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	+4%	+10%	−4%	+4%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	−30%	−24%	+863%	–	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.0 kn	+66%	+85%	−73%	–	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 66%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	−15%	−29%	−49%	−24%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−14%	−20%	+42%	+66%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	+4%	+9%	+19%	−42%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.0 kn	+2%	+12%	−37%	+54%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	SYNERGY DENMARK A/S	2,930	9,277	32,091	2,660	12.1	91.3	20.11	40%
2024	SYNERGY DENMARK A/S	2,962	9,338	33,596	2,965	11.3	88.2	19.39	44%
2023	not published	439	1,408	3,487	334	10.4	126.0	–	43%
2022	not published	994	3,102	13,110	1,399	9.4	75.8	16.18	49%
2021	not published	2,321	7,275	25,889	2,315	11.2	89.7	21.31	–
2020	not published	1,903	5,970	18,285	1,510	12.1	104.1	12.85	–
2019	not published	1,535	4,808	15,353	1,331	11.5	100.0	22.18	–
2018	not published	2,401	7,542	24,397	2,322	10.5	98.4	14.42	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SYNERGY DENMARK A/S	20.11	7.95	+153%	1,395 of 1,665	ABS	A+C
2024	SYNERGY DENMARK A/S	19.39	8.06	+141%	1,515 of 1,787	ABS	A+C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	A
2022	not published	16.18	8.51	+90%	1,581 of 1,961	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	21.31	8.86	+141%	1,551 of 1,789	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	12.85	9.03	+42%	1,303 of 1,870	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	22.18	8.83	+151%	1,675 of 1,919	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	14.42	8.86	+63%	1,363 of 1,779	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.