Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

CORCOVADO LNG

IMO: 9636711
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.50 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TMS Cardiff Gas Ltd. · part of TMS Group (Economou)

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

262

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+4%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.1

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (+7%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

86.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,444 t

CO₂ emitted

48,181 t

Distance sailed

62,698 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,557 h

190 days, 52% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 194 kg/nm · median 190 (+2%)

152Ranks 210 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 14.4 (+3%)

11.2Faster than 61% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 3.42 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−52%)

5.06Ranks 2 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU52%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

15,507 t

94% of all fuel; 6% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,645 t

5.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CORCOVADO LNG
LNG carrier median

0.0100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Average speed, kn

CORCOVADO LNG
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

CORCOVADO LNG
LNG carrier median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2025	+1.1 kn	−26%	−20%	−99%	−69%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.5 kn	−8%	−27%	+422%	−2%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.2 kn	+17%	+34%	−65%	−53%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.0 kn	−20%	+9%	−6%	−23%	4.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.5 kn	+5%	−14%	+81%	+267%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	TMS Cardiff Gas Ltd.	66	175	338	23	14.9	194	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	16,444	48,181	62,698	4,557	13.8	262	–	94%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	3,411	9,972	12,012	693	17.3	284	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	8,321	23,019	34,228	2,262	15.1	243	24.1	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	11,063	30,422	36,334	3,271	11.1	305	31.3	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	5,805	16,165	20,033	1,478	13.6	290	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	TMS Cardiff Gas Ltd.	3.42	7.12	−52%	2 of 386	ABS	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	11.1	10.4	+7%	221 of 379	ABS	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	11.3	10.5	+8%	162 of 289	ABS	A+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	24.1	42.3	−43%	96 of 339	ABS	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	31.3	45.9	−32%	108 of 331	ABS	A+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	8.53	10.9	−22%	44 of 197	ABS	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.