Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

WOOYANG CLES

IMO: 9638147
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 14,241 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CIELO DI MONACO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Wooyang Shipping Co., Ltd

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 24,946 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

90.2

Bulk carrier median 90.8 kg/nm (−1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.71 (+31%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

962 t

CO₂ emitted

3,041 t

Distance sailed

10,665 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,004 h

42 days, 11% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 65.0 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−23%)

61.8Ranks 432 of 3,089, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 10.6 (+21%)

8.8Faster than 98% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+78%)

4.85Ranks 2,712 of 3,089, lowest first15.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports27%
From the EU10%
Into the EU55%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

245 t

8.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

WOOYANG CLES
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Average speed, kn

WOOYANG CLES
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WOOYANG CLES
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2024	+2.2 kn	−28%	−13%	−39%	+26%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+24%	+20%	−63%	+35%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	+7%	−3%	+33%	−11%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.8 kn	−17%	+22%	−6%	−7%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+10%	−1%	+201%	−9%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	Wooyang Shipping Co., Ltd	423	1,335	6,515	508	12.8	65.0	14.4	–
2022	not published	962	3,041	10,665	1,004	10.6	90.2	11.4	–
2021	not published	2,088	6,517	28,628	2,608	11.0	72.9	8.48	–
2020	not published	1,474	4,645	21,549	1,799	12.0	68.4	9.57	–
2019	not published	1,901	5,952	23,031	2,819	8.2	82.5	10.3	–
2018	not published	575	1,800	7,643	848	9.0	75.2	11.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Wooyang Shipping Co., Ltd	14.4	8.09	+78%	2,712 of 3,089	Korean Register	A
2022	not published	11.4	8.71	+31%	2,885 of 3,968	Korean Register	A
2021	not published	8.48	8.57	−1%	1,684 of 3,466	RINA	B
2020	not published	9.57	8.24	+16%	2,048 of 3,150	RINA	B
2019	not published	10.3	8.38	+23%	2,325 of 3,360	RINA	B
2018	not published	11.3	8.50	+33%	2,562 of 3,384	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.