Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ATLANTIC ORCHARD

IMO: 9638159
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.82 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CIELO DI TOCOPILLA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Wisby Shipmanagement AB

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

82.7 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+134%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

20.10

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−21%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+38%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,138 t

CO₂ emitted

16,086 t

16,339 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

62,124 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,842 h

202 days, 55% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 82.7 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+134%)

17.4Ranks 2,503 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 9.3 (+38%)

7.0Faster than 95% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 20.10 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−21%)

10.14Ranks 833 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU48%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU4%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,354 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ATLANTIC ORCHARD
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ATLANTIC ORCHARD
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ATLANTIC ORCHARD
General cargo median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−4%	+1%	−19%	+1%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	+3%	+0%	−16%	−3%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−4%	−1%	+48%	+32%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+2%	−6%	−20%	−32%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−6%	−5%	+251%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2020	+2.1 kn	+27%	+52%	−31%	+319%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Wisby Shipmanagement AB	5,138	16,086	62,124	4,842	12.8	82.7	–	–
2024	Wisby Shipmanagement AB	6,594	20,623	76,497	6,291	12.2	86.2	–	–
2023	not published	7,607	23,789	90,772	7,231	12.6	83.8	–	–
2022	not published	5,379	16,811	61,530	5,076	12.1	87.4	–	–
2021	not published	6,550	20,495	76,460	5,799	13.2	85.7	–	–
2020	not published	1,997	6,238	21,795	1,684	12.9	91.6	–	–
2018	not published	2,286	7,153	31,715	2,929	10.8	72.1	5.76	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Wisby Shipmanagement AB	20.10	25.45	−21%	833 of 2,706	DNV	A
2024	Wisby Shipmanagement AB	19.82	19.25	+3%	582 of 1,111	DNV	A
2023	not published	20.38	20.67	−1%	510 of 1,045	DNV	A
2022	not published	15.48	21.57	−28%	277 of 1,034	DNV	A
2021	not published	22.66	22.70	−0%	569 of 1,142	DNV	A
2020	not published	24.13	24.50	−2%	560 of 1,167	DNV	A
2018	not published	5.76	8.50	−32%	579 of 3,384	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.