Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GASLOG SARATOGA

IMO: 9638903
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.33 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

252

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (−18%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

6.51

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (−40%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

87.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,424 t

CO₂ emitted

17,709 t

Distance sailed

25,479 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,763 h

73 days, 20% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2021

Set against all 289 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 209 kg/nm · median 257 (−18%)

171Ranks 80 of 289, lowest first378

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 14.6 (+5%)

11.4Faster than 69% of LNG carrier ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 10.3 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.5 (−2%)

5.77Ranks 142 of 289, lowest first20.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU54%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

4,683 t

73% of all fuel; 27% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

492 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GASLOG SARATOGA
LNG carrier median

200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

Average speed, kn

GASLOG SARATOGA
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

GASLOG SARATOGA
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−2%	+0%	−35%	+16%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	−16%	−12%	+31%	+36%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.0 kn	−7%	−23%	+120%	+24%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2021LNG / alt.	not published	4,560	12,568	21,780	1,413	15.4	209	–	46%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	7,095	19,573	33,304	2,202	15.1	213	–	48%
2019LNG / alt.	not published	6,424	17,709	25,479	1,763	14.4	252	–	73%
2018LNG / alt.	not published	3,124	8,615	11,571	664	17.4	270	–	94%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2021LNG / alt.	not published	10.3	10.5	−2%	142 of 289	ABS	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	8.88	10.7	−17%	72 of 267	ABS	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	6.51	10.9	−40%	28 of 248	ABS	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	5.27	10.9	−52%	16 of 197	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.