Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GASLOG SALEM

IMO: 9638915
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.31 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

252

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (−18%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

8.81

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (−19%)

Average speed

15.3 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

92.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,732 t

CO₂ emitted

21,643 t

Distance sailed

30,708 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,004 h

84 days, 23% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2022

Set against all 379 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 249 kg/nm · median 252 (−2%)

174Ranks 186 of 379, lowest first380

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 14.1 (+5%)

10.2Faster than 66% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 13.9 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.4 (+34%)

5.96Ranks 279 of 379, lowest first26.4

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU45%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

4,198 t

54% of all fuel; 46% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

348 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GASLOG SALEM
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Average speed, kn

GASLOG SALEM
LNG carrier median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

GASLOG SALEM
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2021→2022	+0.9 kn	+30%	+38%	−0%	+53%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−4.4 kn	−14%	−35%	−52%	+7%	4.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.0 kn	−11%	+6%	−24%	−4%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.5 kn	−3%	−11%	−20%	+66%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2022LNG / alt.	not published	2,780	7,928	11,181	754	14.8	249	–	46%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	2,156	5,945	11,231	808	13.9	192	–	48%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	5,202	14,332	23,292	1,272	18.3	223	–	53%
2019LNG / alt.	not published	7,732	21,643	30,708	2,004	15.3	252	–	54%
2018LNG / alt.	not published	9,962	27,445	38,459	2,288	16.8	259	–	86%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2022LNG / alt.	not published	13.9	10.4	+34%	279 of 379	ABS	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	9.08	10.5	−13%	119 of 289	ABS	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	8.45	10.7	−21%	67 of 267	ABS	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	8.81	10.9	−19%	65 of 248	ABS	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	5.30	10.9	−51%	17 of 197	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.