Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

PRINCE JOY

IMO
9644251
Type
General cargo ship
Average cargo carried
4,340 t
Port of registry
San Marino
Technical efficiency
EEXI 8.15 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IB
Former names
UNIVERSAL DURBAN, TRANSOCEAN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Rix Bulk Management SIA

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,340 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
73.9 kg/nm
General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+109%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
15.62
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−39%)
Average speed
9.6 kn
General cargo median 9.3 kn (+3%)
Fuel per day at sea
16.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,143 t
CO₂ emitted
3,630 t
3,686 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
15,478 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,620 h
68 days, 18% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 73.9 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+109%)
17.4Ranks 2,341 of 2,706, lowest first78.8
Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 9.3 (+3%)
7.0Faster than 55% of general cargo ships12.1
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 15.62 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−39%)
10.14Ranks 498 of 2,706, lowest first52.37
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports25%
  • From the EU51%
  • Into the EU19%
  • At berth in the EU6%

14% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (506 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
5.5%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • PRINCE JOY
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • PRINCE JOY
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • PRINCE JOY
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+0.0 kn+13%+13%−36%−0%Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−1.1 kn+11%−1%+126%+0%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+2.3 kn−23%−2%−52%−8%2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−0.7 kn−9%−16%+45%−15%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.6 kn+10%+17%−3%+24%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020−0.5 kn+5%+0%+12%+2%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+2.1 kn−10%+17%+45%−6%2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025part-yearRix Bulk Management SIA8622,73311,7591,3398.873.3––
2025seagoing maritime co1,1433,63015,4781,6209.673.954.05–
2024part-yearRix Shipmanagement1,4034,41822,1562,2579.863.3––
2024Rix Bulk Management SIA1,5794,98324,2352,5319.665.2––
2023not published6322,00410,7421,00010.758.9––
2022not published1,7045,38922,2242,6448.476.716.99–
2021not published1,2944,08215,3031,6849.184.619.91–
2020not published1,2143,83215,8201,8618.576.816.01–
2019not published1,0253,20614,0881,5669.072.815.71–
2018not published7862,4679,7291,4076.980.816.78–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearRix Bulk Management SIA––––RINAA
2025seagoing maritime co15.6225.45−39%498 of 2,706Dromon Bureau of Shipping–
2024part-yearRix Shipmanagement––––DNVA
2024Rix Bulk Management SIA15.6719.25−19%436 of 1,111RINAA
2023not published15.6620.67−24%336 of 1,045DNVA
2022not published16.998.71+95%3,571 of 3,968DNVA
2021not published19.918.57+132%3,303 of 3,466DNVA
2020not published16.018.24+94%2,898 of 3,150DNVB
2019not published15.718.38+87%3,037 of 3,360VerifaviaB+C
2018not published16.788.50+97%3,083 of 3,384VerifaviaB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.