Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

TEONA

IMO: 9648843
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EIV 14.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: BURHAN DIZMAN 3

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CAPRAMAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI LTD. STI.

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,294 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

33.3

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

–

g CO₂/dwt·nm

Average speed

9.3 kn

Fuel per day at sea

7.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

844 t

CO₂ emitted

2,707 t

Distance sailed

25,364 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,715 h

113 days, 31% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 28.0 kg/nm · median 35.2 (−20%)

17.4Ranks 1,035 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 9.3 (+15%)

6.9Faster than 75% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 20.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−22%)

10.2Ranks 825 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports29%
From the EU34%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

128 t

4.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TEONA
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TEONA
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

TEONA
General cargo median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’212021’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.4 kn	−3%	+11%	−32%	–	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−9%	−7%	+6%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−5%	−7%	+1%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	−10%	−9%	−36%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	+33%	+22%	+18%	–	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 33%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.2 kn	−12%	+29%	+3%	–	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+6%	+4%	−10%	+23%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CAPRAMAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI LTD. STI.	513	1,646	18,340	1,715	10.7	28.0	–	–
2024	CAPRAMAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI LTD. STI.	778	2,496	27,032	2,895	9.3	28.8	17.5	–
2023	not published	803	2,574	25,493	2,758	9.2	31.5	25.9	–
2022	not published	844	2,707	25,364	2,715	9.3	33.3	24.9	–
2021	not published	1,449	4,647	39,381	4,255	9.3	36.8	24.7	–
2020	not published	924	2,963	33,412	3,297	10.1	27.7	16.9	–
2019	not published	1,020	3,190	32,364	4,717	6.9	31.5	–	–
2018	not published	1,075	3,355	36,129	5,178	7.0	29.7	17.7	5%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CAPRAMAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI LTD. STI.	20.0	25.5	−22%	825 of 2,723	ClassNK	B
2024	CAPRAMAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI LTD. STI.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	24.7	8.57	+188%	3,386 of 3,466	ClassNK	A+B
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	EMICERT	A
2019	not published	20.6	25.0	−17%	376 of 1,154	Korean Register	A
2018	not published	16.8	24.9	−33%	237 of 1,044	Korean Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.