Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

ENERGY ATLANTIC

IMO: 9649328
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.72 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

265

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.0

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+21%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−15%)

Fuel per day at sea

77.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,093 t

CO₂ emitted

47,566 t

Distance sailed

64,553 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,319 h

222 days, 61% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 265 kg/nm · median 231 (+15%)

167Ranks 223 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 14.2 (−15%)

10.7Faster than 23% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 11.0 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+21%)

5.47Ranks 241 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

16,307 t

95% of all fuel; 5% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,179 t

4.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ENERGY ATLANTIC
LNG carrier median

225.0250.0275.0300.0325.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

ENERGY ATLANTIC
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

ENERGY ATLANTIC
LNG carrier median

8.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	+9%	+19%	−3%	+12%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+2%	−4%	+100%	+10%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−3.1 kn	−6%	−26%	+206%	+0%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+4%	+8%	−76%	+7%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.6 kn	+6%	−4%	+289%	−10%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023LNG / alt.	not published	17,093	47,566	64,553	5,319	12.1	265	–	95%
2022LNG / alt.	not published	16,176	45,666	66,799	5,983	11.2	242	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	7,922	22,599	33,482	2,815	11.9	237	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	2,751	7,597	10,931	728	15.0	252	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	11,039	30,784	45,707	3,141	14.6	242	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	2,670	7,628	11,753	727	16.2	227	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG / alt.	not published	11.0	9.10	+21%	241 of 355	ABS	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	9.84	10.4	−5%	176 of 379	DNV	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	8.95	10.5	−14%	114 of 289	DNV	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	8.92	10.7	−17%	74 of 267	DNV	A
2019LNG / alt.	not published	8.33	10.9	−23%	56 of 248	DNV	A
2018LNG / alt.	not published	9.29	10.9	−15%	55 of 197	DNV	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.