Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MARAN GAS ALEXANDRIA

IMO: 9650054
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Greece
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.64 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MARAN GAS MARITIME INC. · part of Maran

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

188

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (−25%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

7.40

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (−29%)

Average speed

9.6 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (−32%)

Fuel per day at sea

43.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,331 t

CO₂ emitted

20,515 t

Distance sailed

38,971 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,046 h

169 days, 46% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 188 kg/nm · median 190 (−2%)

152Ranks 187 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 14.4 (−28%)

11.2Faster than 7% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 6.08 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−15%)

5.06Ranks 143 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU52%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

312 t

1.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MARAN GAS ALEXANDRIA
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MARAN GAS ALEXANDRIA
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

MARAN GAS ALEXANDRIA
LNG carrier median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.5 kn	+9%	−6%	−21%	+3%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−20%	−20%	−9%	−45%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+2.2 kn	+15%	+40%	−41%	+45%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.5 kn	+5%	−23%	+86%	+10%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	−46%	−40%	+53%	−58%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 46%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.4 kn	−17%	+17%	+120%	−70%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.2 kn	+36%	+118%	−20%	+327%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 36%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	MARAN GAS MARITIME INC.	3,087	8,710	16,458	1,603	10.3	188	–	64%
2024LNG	MARAN GAS MARITIME INC.	3,616	9,739	20,929	1,768	11.8	173	–	96%
2023LNG / alt.	not published	4,968	13,815	22,938	1,952	11.8	217	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7,331	20,515	38,971	4,046	9.6	188	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	3,748	10,335	20,971	1,600	13.1	179	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	4,503	12,607	13,682	1,159	11.8	329	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	2,474	6,824	6,214	743	8.4	398	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	2,264	6,360	7,739	1,483	5.2	293	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	MARAN GAS MARITIME INC.	6.08	7.12	−15%	143 of 386	ABS	A+B
2024LNG	MARAN GAS MARITIME INC.	5.88	7.39	−20%	98 of 312	ABS	A+B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	10.8	9.10	+18%	234 of 355	ABS	A+B
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7.40	10.4	−29%	110 of 379	ABS	A
2021LNG / alt.	not published	6.73	10.5	−36%	54 of 289	ABS	A
2020LNG / alt.	not published	15.9	10.7	+48%	230 of 267	ABS	A
2019LNG / alt.	not published	52.9	10.9	+387%	244 of 248	ABS	A
2018LNG / alt.	not published	12.4	10.9	+13%	130 of 197	ABS	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.