Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

TIBER RIVER

IMO: 9650949
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.96 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: LYUBOV

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: RIVERS GROUP DENIZCILIK LTD. STI.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,010 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

29.7

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (−46%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

12.7

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (−48%)

Average speed

5.8 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (−46%)

Fuel per day at sea

4.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

542 t

CO₂ emitted

1,711 t

Distance sailed

18,268 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,139 h

131 days, 36% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 23.9 kg/nm · median 35.2 (−32%)

17.4Ranks 724 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 8.0 kn · median 9.3 (−14%)

6.9Faster than 22% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 6.36 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−75%)

10.2Ranks 35 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports39%
From the EU24%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

166 t

9.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TIBER RIVER
General cargo median

20.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TIBER RIVER
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

TIBER RIVER
General cargo median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.6 kn	−18%	+2%	−18%	−67%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+18%	+5%	−6%	−2%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	−2%	−12%	−16%	−0%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	+2.3 kn	−15%	+20%	+55%	+58%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+4%	+5%	−40%	−49%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−10%	−5%	+64%	+19%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	RIVERS GROUP DENIZCILIK LTD. STI.	439	1,409	18,397	2,288	8.0	23.9	–	–
2024	RIVERS GROUP DENIZCILIK LTD. STI.	657	2,107	22,454	3,525	6.4	29.3	7,880	74%
2023	not published	591	1,895	23,869	3,261	7.3	24.8	–	53%
2022	not published	714	2,288	28,346	3,490	8.1	25.2	–	–
2020	not published	542	1,711	18,268	3,139	5.8	29.7	18.7	–
2019	not published	865	2,715	30,315	5,332	5.7	28.5	24.7	–
2018	not published	585	1,846	18,531	3,416	5.4	31.6	20.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	RIVERS GROUP DENIZCILIK LTD. STI.	6.36	25.5	−75%	35 of 2,723	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	RIVERS GROUP DENIZCILIK LTD. STI.	19.5	19.3	+2%	572 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	20.0	20.7	−3%	490 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	20.0	21.6	−7%	442 of 1,034	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	12.7	24.5	−48%	141 of 1,167	ICS Verification Services	A
2019	not published	24.7	25.0	−1%	567 of 1,154	ICS Verification Services	A
2018	not published	20.8	24.9	−17%	369 of 1,044	ICS Verification Services	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.