Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GOLAR TUNDRA

IMO: 9655808
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.51 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

454

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (+47%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

12.4

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (+14%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

118.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,779 t

CO₂ emitted

57,254 t

Distance sailed

45,737 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,214 h

176 days, 48% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2022

Set against all 379 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 243 kg/nm · median 252 (−4%)

174Ranks 177 of 379, lowest first380

Average speedThis ship 13.4 kn · median 14.1 (−5%)

10.2Faster than 37% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 7.33 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.4 (−29%)

5.96Ranks 105 of 379, lowest first26.4

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU35%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

710 t

1.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GOLAR TUNDRA
LNG carrier median

200.0300.0400.0500.0600.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Average speed, kn

GOLAR TUNDRA
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

GOLAR TUNDRA
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	−12%	−20%	+310%	−37%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−16%	−15%	−41%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.6 kn	−27%	−3%	−62%	+8%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.8 kn	−16%	−42%	+297%	−19%	4.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10,231	28,343	42,068	3,148	13.4	243	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	2,848	7,956	10,273	699	14.7	277	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	5,725	16,044	17,346	1,196	14.5	330	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	20,779	57,254	45,737	4,214	10.9	454	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	6,209	17,074	11,524	732	15.7	539	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7.33	10.4	−29%	105 of 379	DNV	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	11.7	10.5	+12%	174 of 289	DNV	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	13.4	10.7	+25%	194 of 267	DNV	C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	12.4	10.9	+14%	163 of 248	DNV	C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	15.2	10.9	+39%	162 of 197	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.