EEMS DUISBURG
- IMO
- 9658094
- Type
- Other ship types (Offshore)
- Port of registry
- Delfzijl
- Technical efficiency
- EIV 19.00 g CO₂/t·nm
ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Scheepvaartonderneming Eems Duisburg B.V.
2025 at a glance
From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.
Within the offshore fleet, 2024
Set against all 5 offshore ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.
Where the emissions happen, 2025
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
- Between EU ports31%
- From the EU30%
- Into the EU36%
- At berth in the EU3%
62% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,535 t).
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The Offshore median is the middle ship of all offshore ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel per mile, kg/nm
- EEMS DUISBURG
- Offshore median
Average speed, kn
- EEMS DUISBURG
- Offshore median
CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm
- EEMS DUISBURG
- Offshore median
Year on year
| Year | Speed | Fuel per mile | Fuel per day | Distance | CO₂ per TW | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024→2025 | −2.7 kn | +12% | −14% | +97% | – | 2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2023→2024 | +3.2 kn | −9% | +25% | −36% | +53% | 3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2022→2023 | −0.5 kn | −8% | −13% | +47% | +7% | 0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change. |
| 2021→2022 | +0.1 kn | +9% | +10% | −30% | +10% | Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2020→2021 | +2.1 kn | −9% | +18% | +12% | +15% | 2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2019→2020 | −2.1 kn | +5% | −19% | −9% | −19% | 2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2018→2019 | +5.3 kn | +3% | +144% | +8% | +20% | 5.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | At sea h | Speed kn | Fuel kg/nm | CO₂ g/t·nm | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Scheepvaartonderneming Eems Duisburg B.V. | 1,773 | 5,683 | 47,502 | 5,190 | 9.2 | 37.3 | – | – |
| 2024 | Scheepvaartonderneming Eems Duisburg B.V. | 803 | 2,574 | 24,132 | 2,031 | 11.9 | 33.3 | 94.47 | – |
| 2023 | not published | 1,378 | 4,418 | 37,847 | 4,367 | 8.7 | 36.4 | – | – |
| 2022 | not published | 1,017 | 3,260 | 25,813 | 2,817 | 9.2 | 39.4 | – | – |
| 2021 | not published | 1,337 | 4,286 | 36,857 | 4,050 | 9.1 | 36.3 | – | – |
| 2020 | not published | 1,313 | 4,209 | 33,016 | 4,686 | 7.0 | 39.8 | – | – |
| 2019 | not published | 1,377 | 4,416 | 36,295 | 4,006 | 9.1 | 38.0 | – | – |
| 2018 | not published | 1,239 | 3,974 | 33,525 | 8,759 | 3.8 | 37.0 | 47.46 | – |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm | Offshore median | vs Offshore | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Scheepvaartonderneming Eems Duisburg B.V. | – | – | – | – | RINA | A |
| 2024 | Scheepvaartonderneming Eems Duisburg B.V. | 94.47 | 48.81 | +94% | 5 of 5 | RINA | A |
| 2023 | not published | 61.79 | 20.67 | +199% | 1,005 of 1,045 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2022 | not published | 57.61 | 21.57 | +167% | 975 of 1,034 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2021 | not published | 52.57 | 22.70 | +132% | 1,079 of 1,142 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2020 | not published | 45.84 | 24.50 | +87% | 1,032 of 1,167 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2019 | not published | 56.85 | 24.96 | +128% | 1,046 of 1,154 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2018 | not published | 47.46 | 24.89 | +91% | 894 of 1,044 | Bureau Veritas | A |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Offshore ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's offshore ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.