Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

WAASMUNSTER

IMO: 9659103
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 657 t
Flag (estimated): Belgium
Port of registry: Antwerpen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.29 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Exmar Shipping BV · part of Exmar

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,480 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

106

Gas carrier (LPG) median 88.1 kg/nm (+20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

39.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 42.5 (−7%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.8 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,809 t

CO₂ emitted

11,993 t

Distance sailed

35,923 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,806 h

117 days, 32% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 86.9 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+7%)

49.8Ranks 214 of 355, lowest first124

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 12.6 (+10%)

8.8Faster than 72% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 414 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (+1,065%)

14.4Ranks 351 of 355, lowest first120

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports26%
From the EU44%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,136 t

9.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

WAASMUNSTER
Gas carrier (LPG) median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0130.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Average speed, kn

WAASMUNSTER
Gas carrier (LPG) median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WAASMUNSTER
Gas carrier (LPG) median

0.0100200300400500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2025	+1.0 kn	−18%	−12%	−65%	+952%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.3 kn	−10%	+1%	−13%	+17%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	+5%	+1%	−17%	+3%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−8%	−7%	+7%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.8 kn	+2%	+32%	+16%	−68%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Exmar Shipping BV	1,087	3,403	12,500	908	13.8	86.9	414	–
2022	not published	3,809	11,993	35,923	2,806	12.8	106	39.4	–
2021	not published	4,840	15,274	41,276	3,589	11.5	117	33.6	–
2020	not published	5,504	17,341	49,480	4,101	12.1	111	32.7	–
2019	not published	5,593	17,622	46,222	3,895	11.9	121	36.7	–
2018	not published	4,734	14,910	39,877	4,361	9.1	119	116	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Exmar Shipping BV	414	35.6	+1,065%	351 of 355	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	39.4	42.5	−7%	165 of 348	DNV	C
2021	not published	33.6	46.9	−28%	108 of 323	DNV	C
2020	not published	32.7	42.3	−23%	135 of 339	DNV	B
2019	not published	36.7	45.9	−20%	140 of 331	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	116	53.1	+119%	244 of 297	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.