Navalyze · Container · Ship

BALTIMORE EXPRESS

IMO: 9665621
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 118,147 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.53 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: THALASSA ELPIDA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Enesel Dry SA · part of Enesel

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 118,147 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

247.4 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+40%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.53

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−60%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

86.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,441 t

CO₂ emitted

35,674 t

36,236 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

46,240 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,162 h

132 days, 36% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 247.4 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+40%)

78.8Ranks 1,625 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 13.3 (+10%)

9.1Faster than 71% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.53 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−60%)

7.22Ranks 126 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU4%
Into the EU91%
At berth in the EU2%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (18,679 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BALTIMORE EXPRESS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

BALTIMORE EXPRESS
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BALTIMORE EXPRESS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2025	+1.9 kn	−1%	+14%	+108%	−17%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.6 kn	−17%	−35%	−41%	−17%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−9%	−12%	−40%	−1%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+11%	+9%	−4%	+8%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	+7%	+11%	+86%	+10%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−10%	−10%	−47%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Enesel Dry SA	11,441	35,674	46,240	3,162	14.6	247.4	6.53	–
2023	not published	5,543	17,280	22,251	1,747	12.7	249.1	7.84	–
2022	not published	11,393	35,615	37,967	2,331	16.3	300.1	9.48	–
2021	not published	20,885	65,894	63,024	3,742	16.8	331.4	9.55	–
2020	not published	19,529	61,587	65,334	3,808	17.2	298.9	8.81	–
2019	not published	9,821	30,745	35,062	2,116	16.6	280.1	7.98	–
2018	not published	20,815	65,061	66,775	4,017	16.6	311.7	8.66	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Enesel Dry SA	6.53	16.30	−60%	126 of 2,208	DNV	A
2023	not published	7.84	19.40	−60%	232 of 1,899	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	9.48	19.13	−50%	285 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	9.55	17.90	−47%	290 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	8.81	17.58	−50%	291 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	7.98	18.88	−58%	188 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	8.66	20.22	−57%	174 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.