Navalyze · Container · Ship

BALTIMORE EXPRESS

IMO: 9665621
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 118,147 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.53 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: THALASSA ELPIDA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Enesel Dry SA · part of Enesel

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 106,997 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

299

Container median 172 kg/nm (+74%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.81

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−50%)

Average speed

17.2 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

123.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,529 t

CO₂ emitted

61,587 t

Distance sailed

65,334 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,808 h

159 days, 43% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 247 kg/nm · median 177 (+40%)

78.8Ranks 1,625 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 13.3 (+10%)

9.1Faster than 71% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.53 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−60%)

7.22Ranks 126 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU36%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,049 t

5.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BALTIMORE EXPRESS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

BALTIMORE EXPRESS
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BALTIMORE EXPRESS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	+1.9 kn	−1%	+14%	+108%	−17%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.6 kn	−17%	−35%	−41%	−17%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−9%	−12%	−40%	−1%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+11%	+9%	−4%	+8%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	+7%	+11%	+86%	+10%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−10%	−10%	−47%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Enesel Dry SA	11,441	35,674	46,240	3,162	14.6	247	6.53	–
2023	not published	5,543	17,280	22,251	1,747	12.7	249	7.84	–
2022	not published	11,393	35,615	37,967	2,331	16.3	300	9.48	–
2021	not published	20,885	65,894	63,024	3,742	16.8	331	9.55	–
2020	not published	19,529	61,587	65,334	3,808	17.2	299	8.81	–
2019	not published	9,821	30,745	35,062	2,116	16.6	280	7.98	–
2018	not published	20,815	65,061	66,775	4,017	16.6	312	8.66	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Enesel Dry SA	6.53	16.3	−60%	126 of 2,208	DNV	A
2023	not published	7.84	19.4	−60%	232 of 1,899	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	9.48	19.1	−50%	285 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	9.55	17.9	−47%	290 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	8.81	17.6	−50%	291 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	7.98	18.9	−58%	188 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	8.66	20.2	−57%	174 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.