Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG JUROJIN

IMO
9666998
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Bahamas
Port of registry
Nassau
Technical efficiency
EIV 9.17 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
269
LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (−9%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
9.86
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (−8%)
Average speed
15.0 kn
LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (+2%)
Fuel per day at sea
96.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
17,902 t
CO₂ emitted
49,306 t
Distance sailed
66,634 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,440 h
185 days, 51% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2020

Set against all 267 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 269 kg/nm · median 297 (−9%)
202Ranks 106 of 267, lowest first397
Average speedThis ship 15.0 kn · median 14.7 (+2%)
11.8Faster than 56% of LNG carrier ships16.7
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.86 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.7 (−8%)
6.68Ranks 115 of 267, lowest first18.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports6%
  • From the EU40%
  • Into the EU52%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
661 t
1.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • LNG JUROJIN
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • LNG JUROJIN
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • LNG JUROJIN
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2020+1.5 kn+2%+13%+63%+5%1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+1.3 kn−2%+8%−8%−20%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020LNG / alt.not published17,90249,30666,6344,44015.0269––
2019LNG / alt.not published10,74529,77940,8623,02313.5263––
2018LNG / alt.not published11,97033,97644,5513,64912.2269––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2020LNG / alt.not published9.8610.7−8%115 of 267ClassNKB+C
2019LNG / alt.not published9.4110.9−13%77 of 248ClassNKB+C
2018LNG / alt.not published11.810.9+8%121 of 197ClassNKB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.