Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ZURICH

IMO: 9668893
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 37,403 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.45 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MAJULAH HARBOURFRONT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Newport SA

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 37,403 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

89.3 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+8%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.46

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (−5%)

Average speed

5.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−51%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

822 t

CO₂ emitted

2,569 t

2,609 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9,205 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,768 h

74 days, 20% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 89.3 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+8%)

61.0Ranks 2,328 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 5.2 kn · median 10.7 (−51%)

8.8Faster than 1% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.46 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (−5%)

4.80Ranks 1,606 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU26%
Into the EU63%
At berth in the EU4%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ZURICH
Bulk carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ZURICH
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.014.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ZURICH
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−6.6 kn	−16%	−63%	+378%	−8%	6.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+3.5 kn	+5%	+48%	+38%	+68%	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−4.5 kn	−7%	−40%	−85%	−25%	4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.4 kn	+13%	+39%	−55%	−17%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+5%	+2%	+1%	+65%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Newport SA	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2025part-year	Grehel Shipmanagement Co	822	2,569	9,205	1,768	5.2	89.3	7.46	–
2025	AOSTA SHIPPING SA	822	2,569	9,205	1,768	5.2	89.3	7.46	–
2024	Newport SA	206	644	1,924	164	11.8	106.9	8.07	–
2023	not published	142	441	1,391	167	8.3	101.9	4.81	–
2022	not published	989	3,140	8,997	703	12.8	110.0	6.39	–
2021	not published	1,948	6,157	20,010	1,916	10.4	97.4	7.68	–
2020	not published	1,838	5,817	19,747	1,835	10.8	93.1	4.66	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Newport SA	–	–	–	–	ICS Verification Services	A
2025part-year	Grehel Shipmanagement Co	–	–	–	–	ICS Verification Services	A
2025	AOSTA SHIPPING SA	7.46	7.89	−5%	1,606 of 3,610	ICS Verification Services	A
2024	Newport SA	8.07	8.09	−0%	1,538 of 3,089	ICS Verification Services	A
2023	not published	4.81	8.27	−42%	348 of 3,548	ICS Verification Services	A
2022	not published	6.39	8.71	−27%	873 of 3,968	ICS Verification Services	A
2021	not published	7.68	8.57	−10%	1,303 of 3,466	DNV	C
2020	not published	4.66	8.24	−43%	202 of 3,150	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.