Navalyze · Container · Ship

NORDLUCHS

IMO: 9673666
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 10,361 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EIV 14.75 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: VIOLETA B

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Reederei Nord GmbH

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,361 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

93.6 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

28.76

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+76%)

Average speed

10.0 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−25%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,533 t

CO₂ emitted

14,432 t

14,654 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

48,431 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,867 h

203 days, 56% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 93.6 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−47%)

78.8Ranks 453 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 10.0 kn · median 13.3 (−25%)

9.1Faster than 15% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 28.76 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+76%)

7.22Ranks 1,658 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports65%
From the EU11%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU9%

87% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (12,585 t).

Fuel burned laden

91%

9% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

9.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NORDLUCHS
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NORDLUCHS
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NORDLUCHS
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.7 kn	−15%	−28%	+4%	−14%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.5 kn	+2%	−16%	−15%	−5%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	+1%	−8%	−16%	−17%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	+1%	+9%	+0%	−9%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	+19%	+25%	−16%	+44%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−29%	−27%	+10%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+2%	−4%	−5%	+12%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Reederei Nord GmbH	4,533	14,432	48,431	4,867	10.0	93.6	28.76	91%
2024	Reederei Nord GmbH	5,109	15,959	46,581	3,974	11.7	109.7	33.30	93%
2023	not published	5,931	18,478	55,026	3,880	14.2	107.8	35.16	99%
2022	not published	7,040	22,196	65,882	4,255	15.5	106.9	42.48	98%
2021	not published	6,928	21,859	65,757	4,552	14.4	105.4	46.68	–
2020	not published	6,926	21,856	78,238	5,696	13.7	88.5	32.37	–
2019	not published	8,821	27,544	71,217	5,307	13.4	123.9	42.06	–
2018	not published	9,114	28,439	75,112	5,274	14.2	121.3	37.54	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Reederei Nord GmbH	28.76	16.30	+76%	1,658 of 2,208	ABS	B
2024	Reederei Nord GmbH	33.30	17.52	+90%	1,522 of 1,974	ABS	B
2023	not published	35.16	19.40	+81%	1,457 of 1,899	ABS	–
2022	not published	42.48	19.13	+122%	1,511 of 1,825	ABS	B
2021	not published	46.68	17.90	+161%	1,560 of 1,781	EMICERT	B
2020	not published	32.37	17.58	+84%	1,369 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	42.06	18.88	+123%	1,454 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	37.54	20.22	+86%	1,303 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.