Navalyze · Container · Ship

NORDLUCHS

IMO: 9673666
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 10,361 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EIV 14.75 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: VIOLETA B

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Reederei Nord GmbH

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,121 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

105

Container median 186 kg/nm (−43%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

46.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+161%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

36.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,928 t

CO₂ emitted

21,859 t

Distance sailed

65,757 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,552 h

190 days, 52% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 93.6 kg/nm · median 177 (−47%)

78.8Ranks 453 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.0 kn · median 13.3 (−25%)

9.1Faster than 15% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 28.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+76%)

7.22Ranks 1,658 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports77%
From the EU7%
Into the EU9%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,445 t

6.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NORDLUCHS
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NORDLUCHS
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NORDLUCHS
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.7 kn	−15%	−28%	+4%	−14%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.5 kn	+2%	−16%	−15%	−5%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	+1%	−8%	−16%	−17%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	+1%	+9%	+0%	−9%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	+19%	+25%	−16%	+44%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−29%	−27%	+10%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+2%	−4%	−5%	+12%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Reederei Nord GmbH	4,533	14,432	48,431	4,867	10.0	93.6	28.8	91%
2024	Reederei Nord GmbH	5,109	15,959	46,581	3,974	11.7	110	33.3	93%
2023	not published	5,931	18,478	55,026	3,880	14.2	108	35.2	99%
2022	not published	7,040	22,196	65,882	4,255	15.5	107	42.5	98%
2021	not published	6,928	21,859	65,757	4,552	14.4	105	46.7	–
2020	not published	6,926	21,856	78,238	5,696	13.7	88.5	32.4	–
2019	not published	8,821	27,544	71,217	5,307	13.4	124	42.1	–
2018	not published	9,114	28,439	75,112	5,274	14.2	121	37.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Reederei Nord GmbH	28.8	16.3	+76%	1,658 of 2,208	ABS	B
2024	Reederei Nord GmbH	33.3	17.5	+90%	1,522 of 1,974	ABS	B
2023	not published	35.2	19.4	+81%	1,457 of 1,899	ABS	–
2022	not published	42.5	19.1	+122%	1,511 of 1,825	ABS	B
2021	not published	46.7	17.9	+161%	1,560 of 1,781	EMICERT	B
2020	not published	32.4	17.6	+84%	1,369 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	42.1	18.9	+123%	1,454 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	37.5	20.2	+86%	1,303 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.