Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

GLOVIS SPIRIT

IMO: 9674165
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 4,953 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: G-Marine Service Co Ltd

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,034 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

108

Vehicle carrier median 103 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

42.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 59.6 (−29%)

Average speed

16.2 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,240 t

CO₂ emitted

3,903 t

Distance sailed

11,473 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

708 h

30 days, 8% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 114 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+14%)

79.6Ranks 428 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 14.4 (+6%)

12.0Faster than 76% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 72.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+31%)

34.7Ranks 337 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU65%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

166 t

4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GLOVIS SPIRIT
Vehicle carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GLOVIS SPIRIT
Vehicle carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GLOVIS SPIRIT
Vehicle carrier median

40.060.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	+0%	−7%	−56%	+59%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−2%	−1%	+300%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+7.1 kn	−34%	+17%	+201%	–	7.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 34%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−7.0 kn	+64%	−7%	−89%	+139%	7.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 64%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.0 kn	−9%	+11%	−38%	−28%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	+10%	+3%	−35%	+10%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−7%	−5%	+173%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	744	2,334	6,506	424	15.3	114	72.4	–
2024	HYUNDAI GLOVIS CO LTD	1,697	5,302	14,874	903	16.5	114	45.5	–
2023	not published	435	1,369	3,723	229	16.3	117	–	–
2022	not published	219	702	1,235	134	9.2	177	101	–
2021	not published	1,240	3,903	11,473	708	16.2	108	42.4	–
2020	not published	2,219	6,974	18,579	1,403	13.2	119	58.9	–
2019	not published	3,139	9,775	28,781	2,045	14.1	109	53.4	–
2018	not published	1,230	3,843	10,548	764	13.8	117	51.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	72.4	55.4	+31%	337 of 506	Korean Register	C
2024	HYUNDAI GLOVIS CO LTD	45.5	55.3	−18%	99 of 335	Korean Register	C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	C
2022	not published	101	57.7	+76%	395 of 463	Korean Register	C
2021	not published	42.4	59.6	−29%	57 of 459	Korean Register	C
2020	not published	58.9	57.3	+3%	236 of 449	Korean Register	C
2019	not published	53.4	59.0	−9%	161 of 426	Korean Register	C
2018	not published	51.4	62.4	−17%	93 of 434	Korean Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.