Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL DANUBE

IMO: 9674517
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 52,145 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEDI 11.20 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 67,137 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

263

Container median 172 kg/nm (+52%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−30%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

99.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,199 t

CO₂ emitted

57,489 t

Distance sailed

69,335 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,395 h

183 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,825 container ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 224 kg/nm · median 178 (+26%)

77.9Ranks 1,144 of 1,825, lowest first314

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 13.6 (+9%)

10.1Faster than 71% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.1 (−30%)

7.44Ranks 588 of 1,825, lowest first52.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports32%
From the EU34%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,656 t

4.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

APL DANUBE
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022

Average speed, kn

APL DANUBE
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

APL DANUBE
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	−5%	−17%	+108%	−66%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	−10%	−5%	−84%	+215%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.3 kn	+5%	+32%	+833%	−22%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2022	not published	5,082	15,873	22,733	1,540	14.8	224	13.4	100%
2021	not published	2,572	8,023	10,929	651	16.8	235	38.9	39%
2020	not published	18,199	57,489	69,335	4,395	15.8	263	12.4	–
2019	not published	1,865	5,853	7,428	593	12.5	251	15.8	93%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2022	not published	13.4	19.1	−30%	588 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	38.9	17.9	+117%	1,466 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	12.4	17.6	−30%	532 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	15.8	18.9	−17%	703 of 1,788	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.