Navalyze · Container · Ship

5017 CMA CGM CONGO

IMO: 9679892
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 95,489 t
Technical efficiency: EEDI 9.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CMA CGM CONGO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 95,489 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

323.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+83%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.56

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−35%)

Average speed

17.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+33%)

Fuel per day at sea

137.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,279 t

CO₂ emitted

10,215 t

10,376 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

10,130 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

573 h

24 days, 7% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 323.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+83%)

78.8Ranks 2,078 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 17.7 kn · median 13.3 (+33%)

9.1Faster than 99% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.56 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−35%)

7.22Ranks 638 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU97%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU3%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,257 t).

Fuel burned laden

97%

3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

5017 CMA CGM CONGO
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

5017 CMA CGM CONGO
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

5017 CMA CGM CONGO
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.8 kn	+13%	+35%	−80%	+4%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+3.8 kn	+30%	+74%	+2,256%	+2%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	−6%	−16%	−47%	+4%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	+3%	+5%	−32%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.2 kn	−6%	−15%	−25%	–	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	−10%	−3%	−41%	−15%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	−0%	−9%	+17%	+4%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	3,279	10,215	10,130	573	17.7	323.7	10.56	97%
2024part-year	Meridian 6 Limited	11,060	34,892	38,503	2,641	14.6	287.2	10.19	–
2024	CMA CGM SA	14,679	46,229	51,465	3,460	14.9	285.2	10.19	23%
2023	not published	480	1,516	2,184	198	11.1	219.9	10.03	89%
2022	not published	966	3,050	4,138	334	12.4	233.5	9.67	91%
2021	not published	1,373	4,331	6,075	500	12.2	226.0	–	–
2020	not published	1,959	6,182	8,110	606	13.4	241.6	10.16	100%
2019	not published	3,694	11,528	13,757	1,108	12.4	268.5	11.93	–
2018	not published	3,156	9,848	11,750	864	13.6	268.6	11.48	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	10.56	16.30	−35%	638 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024part-year	Meridian 6 Limited	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2024	CMA CGM SA	10.19	17.52	−42%	464 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	10.03	19.40	−48%	387 of 1,899	ABS	–
2022	not published	9.67	19.13	−49%	296 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2020	not published	10.16	17.58	−42%	392 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	11.93	18.88	−37%	440 of 1,788	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	11.48	20.22	−43%	350 of 1,705	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.